You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 12, December 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laser Surgery
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Confocal and Electron Microscopic Studies of Laser Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) in the White Leghorn Chick Eye

Jae B. Lee, MD, PhD; Joel A. Javier, MD; Jin-Hong Chang, PhD; Chun C. Chen, MD; Takuji Kato, MD, PhD; Dimitri T. Azar, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1700-1706.

Objectives  To evaluate the effect of 20% alcohol on the white leghorn chick cornea and to determine the confocal and electron microscopic findings of laser subepithelial keratomileusis surgery in the white leghorn chick corneal model.

Method  Laser subepithelial keratomileusis surgery was performed on chick corneas and the morphologic changes were examined by transmission electron microscopy. Chick corneas were exposed to 20% alcohol for 30 and 45 seconds or 1 and 2 minutes (5 chicks per group) to evaluate the effect on the corneal epithelium. Photorefractive keratectomy using either mechanical or 20% alcohol–assisted debridement (5 chicks per group) was also performed. Keratocyte and epithelial cell deaths were analyzed 4 hours after surgery using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transfer–mediated biotin-dexoyuridine 5-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining and transmission electron microscopy.

Results  Exposure of the corneal epithelium to 20% alcohol for 30 seconds or longer allowed reproducible separation of epithelial flaps in white leghorn chick eyes. Transmission electron microscopy immediately after alcohol treatment showed that exposure to 20% alcohol for 30 seconds or less had minimal adverse effects on the corneal epithelium. The TUNEL staining of corneas obtained 4 hours after surgery revealed TUNEL-positive cells in the central superficial stroma and more abundantly in the peripheral superficial stroma around the epithelial flap margin and in the epithelial flap itself, particularly in the basal epithelial layer. Transmission electron microscopy showed similar evidence of apoptosis in the epithelium and anterior stroma.

Conclusions  The white leghorn chick eye seems to be a reasonable model for laser subepithelial keratomileusis surgery. Treatment with 20% alcohol for 30 seconds results in reproducible epithelial flap creation in the chick cornea and in relatively low levels of stromal and epithelial cell death after surgery.


From the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and the Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Basement membrane and collagen deposition after laser subepithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in the leghorn chick eye.
Javier et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:703-709.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Morphological and Functional Changes in the Rat Cornea with an Ethanol-Mediated Epithelial Flap
Song and Joo
IOVS 2004;45:423-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation for Safety of Cultured Corneal Fibroblasts with Cotreatment of Alcohol and Mitomycin C
Kim et al.
IOVS 2004;45:86-92.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.