You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 12, December 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •External Eye Disease
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Balloon Catheter Dilation for Treatment of Older Children With Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Gregg T. Lueder, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1685-1688.

Objectives  To describe the outcomes of balloon catheter dilation of the lacrimal duct as the first surgical treatment for older children (>=18 months) with nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction and to examine the effect of the type of obstruction on outcome.

Design  Retrospective noncomparative case series.

Participants  Seventy-six children 18 months or older with NLD obstruction who had not undergone previous surgery.

Intervention  The patients underwent NLD probing, infracturing of the inferior turbinate, and balloon catheter dilation of the distal NLD. The type of obstruction was noted at surgery.

Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes were considered excellent if the patient had complete resolution of epiphora and dacryocystitis and normal tear drainage on examination, good if the patient had only minimal residual symptoms or a minimally delayed dye disappearance test result, fair if the patient had moderate residual symptoms or delayed tear drainage, and poor if there was no improvement.

Results  Seventy-six children were treated. Overall, results were excellent in 28 (37%) patients, good in 30 (39%), fair in 13 (17%), and poor in 5 (7%). Forty-eight (63%) of the patients had simple membranous obstruction at the Hasner valve. Results were good or excellent in 35 (73%) of these patients. Twenty-eight (37%) patients had stenosis that extended along the length of the distal NLD. Results were good or excellent in 23 (82%) of these patients.

Conclusions  Balloon catheter dilation is probably more effective than simple probing for older children with NLD obstruction because of stenosis that extends along the distal NLD. The procedure does not provide a significant advantage over simple NLD probing in patients with typical membranous obstruction at the Hasner valve.


From the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Pediatrics, St Louis Children's Hospital at Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo. The author has no proprietary interest in the LacriCATH catheter.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Balloon Catheter Reuse in Children With Bilateral Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
Vila-Coro and Al-Hussain
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1804-1804.
FULL TEXT  

Balloon Catheter Reuse in Children With Bilateral Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction--Reply
Lueder
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1804-1805.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.