You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 11, November 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Effect of Visual Field Defects on Driving Performance

A Driving Simulator Study

Tanja R. M. Coeckelbergh, PhD; Wiebo H. Brouwer, PhD; Frans W. Cornelissen, PhD; Peter van Wolffelaar, MSc; Aart C. Kooijman, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1509-1516.

Objectives  To investigate the effect of visual field defects on driving performance, and to predict practical fitness to drive.

Methods  The driving performance of 87 subjects with visual field defects due to ocular abnormalities was assessed on a driving simulator and during an on-road driving test.

Outcome Measures  The final score on the on-road driving test and simulator indexes, such as driving speed, viewing behavior, lateral position, time-headway, and time to collision.

Results  Subjects with visual field defects showed differential performance on measures of driving speed, steering stability, lateral position, time to collision, and time-headway. Effective compensation consisted of reduced driving speed in cases of central visual field defects and increased scanning in cases of peripheral visual field defects. The sensitivity and specificity of models based on vision, visual attention, and compensatory viewing efficiency were increased when the distance at which the subject started to scan was taken into account.

Conclusions  Subjects with visual field defects demonstrated differential performance on several driving simulator indexes. Driving examiners considered reduced speed and increased scanning to be valid compensation for central and peripheral visual field defects, respectively. Predicting practical fitness to drive was improved by taking driving simulator indexes into account.


From the Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology (Drs Coeckelbergh, Cornelissen, and Kooijman), the Department of Neuropsychology and Gerontology (Dr Brouwer), and the Computing Center (Mr van Wolffelaar), University of Groningen, and the Department of Ophthalmology (Dr Kooijman), University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; and Visio, the Dutch National Foundation for the Visually Impaired and Blind (Dr Kooijman), Haren, the Netherlands.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessing visual fields for driving in patients with paracentral scotomata
Chisholm et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008;92:225-230.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measures of Visual Function and Their Association with Driving Modification in Older Adults
Freeman et al.
IOVS 2006;47:514-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Glaucoma Associated with Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement and Driving Avoidance?
McGwin et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3934-3939.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.