You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (160)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Discriminating Between Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes Using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph

Linda M. Zangwill, PhD; Christopher Bowd, PhD; Charles C. Berry, PhD; Julia Williams, BS; Eytan Z. Blumenthal, MD; César A. Sánchez-Galeana, MD; Christiana Vasile, MD; Robert N. Weinreb, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:985-993.

Objective  To compare the ability of 3 instruments, the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT), the GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer (GDx), and the Optical Coherence Tomograph (OCT), to discriminate between healthy eyes and eyes with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss.

Subjects and Methods  Forty-one patients with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss and 50 healthy subjects were included in the study. The HRT, GDx, and OCT imaging and visual field testing were completed on 1 eye from each subject within a 6-month interval. Statistical differences in sensitivity at fixed specificities of 85%, 90%, and 95% were evaluated. In addition, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were compared.

Results  No significant differences were found between the area under the ROC curve and the best parameter from each instrument: OCT thickness at the 5-o'clock inferior temporal position (mean ± SE, 0.87 ± 0.04), HRT mean height contour in the nasal inferior region (mean ± SE, 0.86 ± 0.04), and GDx linear discriminant function (mean ± SE, 0.84 ± 0.04). Twelve HRT, 2 GDx, and 9 OCT parameters had an area under the ROC curve of at least 0.81. At a fixed specificity of 90%, significant differences were found between the sensitivity of OCT thickness at the 5-o'clock inferior temporal position (71%) and parameters with sensitivities less than 52%. Qualitative assessment of stereophotographs resulted in a sensitivity of 80%.

Conclusion  Although the area under the ROC curves was similar among the best parameters from each instrument, qualitative assessment of stereophotographs and measurements from the OCT and HRT generally had higher sensitivities than measurements from the GDx.


From the Glaucoma Center and Diagnostic Imaging Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology (Drs Zangwill, Bowd, Blumenthal, Sánchez-Galeana, Vasile, and Weinreb and Ms Williams), and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine (Dr Berry), University of California–San Diego, La Jolla. None of the authors had a proprietary interest in any of the products mentioned in this article at the time the research was completed. J. Williams is now employed by Heidelberg Engineering.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Retrobulbar Optic Nerve Diameter Measured by High-Speed Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biomarker for Axonal Loss in Glaucomatous Optic Atrophy
Lagreze et al.
IOVS 2009;50:4223-4228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optic Disc Progression in Glaucoma: Comparison of Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography to Optic Disc Photographs in a Prospective Study
Chauhan et al.
IOVS 2009;50:1682-1691.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Corneal biomechanics, thickness and optic disc morphology in children with optic disc tilt
Lim et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1461-1466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An unexpectedly low Stratus optical coherence tomography false-positive rate in the non-nasal quadrants of Asian eyes: indirect evidence of differing retinal nerve fibre layer thickness profiles according to ethnicity
Kim et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:735-739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection
Townsend et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:814-818.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Logistic Regression Analysis for Early Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Ferreras et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:465-470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma
Chauhan et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:569-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bayesian Machine Learning Classifiers for Combining Structural and Functional Measurements to Classify Healthy and Glaucomatous Eyes
Bowd et al.
IOVS 2008;49:945-953.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy on Quantitative Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement and Glaucoma Screening
Takahashi and Chihara
IOVS 2008;49:687-692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The use of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement in determining the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass procedures on the optic nerve
Buyukates et al.
Perfusion 2007;22:401-406.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Disc Size and Severity of Disease on the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score
Zangwill et al.
IOVS 2007;48:2653-2660.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Enhanced Corneal Compensation and Optical Coherence Tomography in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes
Sehi et al.
IOVS 2007;48:2099-2104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ability of Stratus OCT to Identify Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects in Patients with Normal Standard Automated Perimetry Results
Kim et al.
IOVS 2007;48:1635-1641.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Study Design and Spectrum Bias on the Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
IOVS 2007;48:214-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discrimination between Glaucomatous and Nonglaucomatous Eyes Using Quantitative Imaging Devices and Subjective Optic Nerve Head Assessment.
DeLeon-Ortega et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3374-3380.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the heidelberg retina tomograph.
Shunmugam and Azuara-Blanco
IOVS 2006;47:2317-2323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Capability of Optical Coherence Tomography in Evaluating the Degree of Glaucomatous Retinal Nerve Fiber Damage
Sihota et al.
IOVS 2006;47:2006-2010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma.
Medeiros et al.
IOVS 2006;47:1008-1015.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of psychophysical and structural injury in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and normal standard automated perimetry.
Bagga et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:169-176.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and Comparison of Automated Classifiers for Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography
Huang and Chen
IOVS 2005;46:4121-4129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optical Coherence Tomography Machine Learning Classifiers for Glaucoma Detection: A Preliminary Study
Burgansky-Eliash et al.
IOVS 2005;46:4147-4152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in Visual Function and Optic Nerve Structure Between Healthy Eyes of Blacks and Whites
Racette et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1547-1553.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Topographic Optic Disc Measurements Are Associated With the Development of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Zangwill et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1188-1197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparability of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements of Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments
Bourne et al.
IOVS 2005;46:1280-1285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optical Coherence Tomography Longitudinal Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma
Wollstein et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:464-470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Measurements of the Optic Disc and Parapapillary Retina for Detecting Glaucoma Analyzed by Machine Learning Classifiers
Zangwill et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3144-3151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Classifiers and Stereophotograph Evaluation for Prediction of Visual Field Abnormalities in Glaucoma-Suspect Eyes
Bowd et al.
IOVS 2004;45:2255-2262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimeter, HRT II Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT Optical Coherence Tomograph for the Detection of Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:827-837.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantifying Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Histologically: A Novel Approach to Sectioning of the Retina
Blumenthal
IOVS 2004;45:1404-1409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Scanning Laser Polarimetry Using Variable Corneal Compensation and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Photography for Detection of Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:698-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma
Essock et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1238-1245.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Differences in the Association between Optic Disc Topography and Early Glaucoma
Girkin et al.
IOVS 2003;44:3382-3387.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Heredity as a Determinant of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography
Hougaard et al.
IOVS 2003;44:3011-3016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fourier Analysis of Scanning Laser Polarimetry Measurements with Variable Corneal Compensation in Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
IOVS 2003;44:2606-2612.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of algorithms for detection of localised nerve fibre layer defects using scanning laser polarimetry
Medeiros and Susanna
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:413-419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acutance, an objective measure of retinal nerve fibre image clarity
Choong et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:322-326.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Glaucoma Detection Using Scanning Laser Polarimetry With Variable Corneal Polarization Compensation
Weinreb et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:218-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Macular Thickness Changes in Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Detected Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Greenfield et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:41-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Neural Networks and Linear Discriminant Functions for Glaucoma Detection Using Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy of the Optic Disc
Bowd et al.
IOVS 2002;43:3444-3454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A few remarks about glaucoma
Wegner
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:836-837.
FULL TEXT  

Measurement of the Magnitude and Axis of Corneal Polarization With Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Weinreb et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:901-906.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes
Cullinane et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:555-559.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early Detection of Moderate Glaucoma: Redefining Clinical Care in 2001
Lee
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1069-1070.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.