You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Herpes
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evidence for Antigen-Specific Immune Deviation in Patients With Acute Retinal Necrosis

Takeshi Kezuka, MD, PhD; Jun-ich Sakai, MD, PhD; Norio Usui, MD, PhD; J. Wayne Streilein, MD; Masahiko Usui, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1044-1049.

Background  Because experimental acute retinal necrosis (ARN) induced by herpes simplex virus in mice develops only if mice fail to acquire virus-specific delayed hypersensitivity (DH), although they produce antiviral antibodies (ie, anterior chamber–associated immune deviation), we sought to determine whether a similar inverse correlation exists for patients with varicella-zoster virus (VZV)–induced ARN.

Design  Patients with acute, VZV-induced ARN and age-matched control subjects were skin tested with VZV and purified protein derivative antigens to evaluate DH. Varicella-zoster virus–induced ARN was diagnosed using polymerase chain reaction and intraocular antibody quotient. Serum samples were collected and analyzed for anti-VZV and anti–herpes simplex virus antibody titers. Acute retinal necrosis activity was assessed clinically, and DH skin tests were repeated 3 months after onset when ocular recovery had taken place.

Results  Whereas controls displayed intense DH when tested with VZV and purified protein derivative antigens, a subset of patients with ARN displayed absent VZV-specific DH (although their purified protein derivative responses were normal). Patients with the most severe ARN had the lowest DH responses to VZV antigens. Serum anti-VZV antibody titers were higher in patients with ARN than in controls, and antiviral titer correlated inversely with the intensity of anti-VZV DH responses. Varicella-zoster virus–specific DH responses were restored in patients who recovered from ARN.

Conclusion  Varicella-zoster virus–ARN develops in a setting where DH reactivity to viral antigens is absent, implying that virus-specific DH might ameliorate the severity of ARN.

Clinical Relevance  Linking virus-specific DH to vulnerability to ARN in individuals infected with VZV might reveal an underappreciated pathogenic mechanism.


From the Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Kezuka, Sakai, N. Usui, and M. Usui); and Schepens Eye Research Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Streilein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impaired Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Innate Immune Responses in Patients with Herpes Virus-Associated Acute Retinal Necrosis
Kittan et al.
J. Immunol. 2007;179:4219-4230.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ocular immune privilege: the eye takes a dim but practical view of immunity and inflammation
Streilein
J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003;74:179-185.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Relationship Between Varicella-Zoster Virus-Specific Delayed Hypersensitivity and Varicella-Zoster Virus-Induced Anterior Uveitis
Kezuka et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1183-1188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.