You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 5, May 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (80)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dry Eye Syndromes
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Reliability and Validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index

Rhett M. Schiffman, MD, MS; Murray Dale Christianson, MD, FRCSC; Gordon Jacobsen, MS; Jan D. Hirsch, PhD; Brenda L. Reis, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:615-621.

Objective  To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.

Methods  Participants (109 patients with dry eye and 30 normal controls) completed the OSDI, the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), the McMonnies Dry Eye Questionnaire, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Status Questionnaire, and an ophthalmic examination including Schirmer tests, tear breakup time, and fluorescein and lissamine green staining.

Results  Factor analysis identified 3 subscales of the OSDI: vision-related function, ocular symptoms, and environmental triggers. Reliability (measured by Cronbach {alpha}) ranged from good to excellent for the overall instrument and each subscale, and test-retest reliability was good to excellent. The OSDI was valid, effectively discriminating between normal, mild to moderate, and severe dry eye disease as defined by both physician's assessment and a composite disease severity score. The OSDI also correlated significantly with the McMonnies questionnaire, the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire, the physical component summary score of the Short Form-12, patient perception of symptoms, and artificial tear usage.

Conclusions  The OSDI is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the severity of dry eye disease, and it possesses the necessary psychometric properties to be used as an end point in clinical trials.


From the Department of Eye Care Services, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich (Drs Schiffman and Christianson and Mr Jacobsen), and Allergan Inc, Irvine, Calif (Drs Hirsch and Reis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):740.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Production and Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 on the Ocular Surface Increase in Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome
Chotikavanich et al.
IOVS 2009;50:3203-3209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for the Development of Ocular Complications of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Gueudry et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:157-162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Value-Based Medicine, Comparative Effectiveness, and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Topical Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome
Brown et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:146-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concordance between common dry eye diagnostic tests
Moore et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009;93:66-72.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Conjunctival and Corneal Pneumatic Sensitivity Is Associated with Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Dryness
Situ et al.
IOVS 2008;49:2971-2976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Corneal Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An In Vivo Confocal Study
Villani et al.
IOVS 2008;49:560-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sjogren's Systemic Clinical Activity Index (SCAI) a systemic disease activity measure for use in clinical trials in primary Sjogren's syndrome
Bowman et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1845-1851.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement of Ocular Surface Irritation on a Linear Interval Scale with the Ocular Comfort Index
Johnson and Murphy
IOVS 2007;48:4451-4458.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cornea in Sjogren's Syndrome: An In Vivo Confocal Study
Villani et al.
IOVS 2007;48:2017-2022.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Relative Burden of Dry Eye in Patients' Lives: Comparisons to a U.S. Normative Sample
Mertzanis et al.
IOVS 2005;46:46-50.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Assessment of Self-Reported Disease Classification in Epidemiological Studies of Dry Eye
Nichols et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3453-3457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms in Women With Premature Ovarian Failure
Smith et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:151-156.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Goblet Cell Numbers and Epithelial Proliferation in the Conjunctiva of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome Treated With Cyclosporine
Kunert et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:330-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome measures in Sjogren's syndrome
Asmussen and Bowman
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40:1085-1088.
FULL TEXT  

Reliability and Validity of a Proposed Dry Eye Evaluation Scheme
Baum and Schiffman
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:456-456.
FULL TEXT  

Analysis of Topical Cyclosporine Treatment of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome: Effect on Conjunctival Lymphocytes
Kunert et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1489-1496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.