You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 2, February 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Epidemiology and Biostatistics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (79)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmology, Other
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Age-Specific Causes of Bilateral Visual Impairment

LeAnn M. Weih, PhD, MSc; Mylan R. VanNewkirk, MD, FRACO; Catherine A. McCarty, PhD, MPH; Hugh R. Taylor, MD, FRACO

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:264-269.

Objectives  To describe the age-specific prevalence of common eye diseases causing bilateral visual impairment and estimate the total number of Australians with cause-specific visual impairment.

Methods  Cluster-stratified random sample of 5147 residents aged 40 years and older from urban and rural areas and aged-care facilities. Participants completed a standardized interview and eye examination. Four levels of bilateral visual impairment were defined: less than 20/40 to 20/60 and/or homonymous hemianopia (mild), less than 20/60 to 20/200 or better and/or less than 20° to 10° radius field (moderate), less than 20/200 to 10/200 and/or less than 10° to 5° radius field (severe), and less than 10/200 and/or less than 5° radius field (profound). The major cause of vision loss was identified for all participants found to be visually impaired.

Results  Uncorrected refractive error was the most common cause of bilateral visual impairment across all decades of life, rising from 0.5% in 40- to 49-year-olds to 13% among those aged 80 years and older. Prevalence of visual impairment due to diabetic retinopathy was 0.7% in 50- to 59-year-olds and 0.8% in those older than 80 years. Visual impairment due to glaucoma had a prevalence of 0.7% among 60-year-olds and rose to 4% of those older than 90 years. The prevalence of visual impairment due to cataract (only present in those aged 70 years or older) rose from 0.6% to 11% in those older than 90 years, and the prevalence of visual impairment due to age-related macular degeneration rose from 0.8% to 16% in those older than 90 years.

Conclusions  The predominant causes of visual impairment change with age. Recognition of these patterns is fundamental for early diagnosis and treatment of eye disease and, where appropriate, referral for rehabilitation.


From the Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Knowledge and beliefs associated with refractive errors and undercorrection: the Singapore Malay Eye Study
Rosman et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009;93:4-10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Mellitus and Visual Impairment: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004
Zhang et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1421-1427.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain
Rahi et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1190-1194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mitochondrial DNA Haplogroups and Age-Related Maculopathy
Jones et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1235-1240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Age-related macular degeneration and recent developments: new hope for old eyes?
Morris et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2007;83:301-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} and Its Ligand on Blood-Retinal Barrier in a Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Model.
Muranaka et al.
IOVS 2006;47:4547-4552.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lutein and zeaxanthin and the risk of cataract: the melbourne visual impairment project.
Vu et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3783-3786.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Syncope and falls due to timolol eye drops
Muller et al.
BMJ 2006;332:960-961.
FULL TEXT  

Nine-Year Refractive Changes in the Barbados Eye Studies
Wu et al.
IOVS 2005;46:4032-4039.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extraocular Muscle Insertions Relative to the Fovea and Optic Nerve: Humans and Rhesus Macaque
Feng et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3493-3496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Self-Reported Visual Impairment Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults
Horowitz et al.
Research on Aging 2005;27:307-326.
ABSTRACT  

The prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study
Fotouhi et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:740-745.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:564-572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The risk of complications of uveitis in a district hospital cohort
Maini et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:512-517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy on Participation in Daily Living
Lamoureux et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:84-88.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Five-Year Incidence of Bilateral Cause-Specific Visual Impairment in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project
Dimitrov et al.
IOVS 2003;44:5075-5081.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How big is the burden of visual loss caused by age related macular degeneration in the United Kingdom?
Owen et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:312-317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why HID headlights bother older drivers
Mainster and Timberlake
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:113-117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Encapsulated Cell-Based Delivery of CNTF Reduces Photoreceptor Degeneration in Animal Models of Retinitis Pigmentosa
Tao et al.
IOVS 2002;43:3292-3298.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vision impairment and older drivers: who's driving?
Keeffe et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1118-1121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vision impairment in the Pacific region
Keeffe et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:605-610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Causes of Incident Visual Impairment: The Blue Mountains Eye Study
Foran et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:613-619.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Impact of Vision Impairment
Weih et al.
IOVS 2002;43:927-935.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Moderate visual impairment in India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study
Dandona et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:373-377.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blindness, Visual Impairment and the Problem of Uncorrected Refractive Error in a Mexican-American Population: Proyecto VER
Munoz et al.
IOVS 2002;43:608-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utilisation of eye care services by urban and rural Australians
Keeffe et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:24-27.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correction of refractive error in the Victorian population: the feasibility of "off the shelf" spectacles
Maini et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1283-1286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

World blindness: a 21st century perspective
Taylor and Keeffe
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:261-266.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.