You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 8, August 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Comparison of Imaging Techniques for Diagnosing Drusen of the Optic Nerve Head

Malaika M. Kurz-Levin, MD; Klara Landau, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1045-1049.

Objective  To determine the best imaging procedure for diagnosing drusen of the optic nerve head.

Methods  We reviewed retrospectively the clinical records of 142 patients (261 eyes) with suspected drusen of the optic disc. The patients were referred to our hospital over a 7-year period and evaluated by B-scan echography, orbital computed tomographic (CT) scan, and/or preinjection control photography for detection of autofluorescence. The relative diagnostic yield of these imaging techniques was compared.

Results  Thirty-six of the 261 eyes were evaluated using all 3 imaging techniques, with drusen of the optic nerve head diagnosed in 21 eyes. Findings from B-scan echography were positive in all 21 eyes compared with 9 positive findings from the CT scans and 10 positive findings from the preinjection control photographs (P<.01 for B-scan echography vs both CT scan and preinjection control photography). In 82 eyes with suspected buried drusen of the optic nerve head, B-scan echography showed drusen in 39 eyes compared with 15 eyes in which drusen were shown using preinjection control photography (P<.001). In the whole series, no diagnosis of drusen was made by either preinjection control photography or CT scan and was missed on B-scan echography.

Conclusions  Drusen of the optic nerve head are diagnosed most reliably using B-scan echography compared with both preinjection control photography and CT scans. Preinjection control photography should be performed mainly when confirmation of visible drusen of the optic disc is desired. Neuroimaging using CT is suitable to exclude diagnosis of an intracranial mass lesion and possibly to detect buried drusen of the optic nerve head at the same time.


From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(8):1104.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pediatric Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Review
Mercille and Ospina
Pediatr. Rev. 2007;28:e77-e86.
FULL TEXT  

Papilloedema or pseudopapilloedema? Computed tomography to the rescue!
Ashwin et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2006;82:580-580.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Investigation of a True Color Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope
Manivannan et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:819-824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.