You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 7, July 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nonsurgical Management of Binocular Diplopia Induced by Macular Pathology

Mark Silverberg, MD; Eileen Schuler, CO; Suzanne Veronneau-Troutman, MD; Kenneth Wald, MD; Abraham Schlossman, MD; Norman Medow, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:900-903.

Objective  To treat binocular diplopia secondary to macular pathology.

Methods  Seven patients underwent evaluation and treatment. All had constant vertical diplopia caused by various maculopathies, including subretinal neovascularization, epiretinal membrane, and central serous retinopathy. Visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to 20/30 in the affected eye. All except 1 patient had a small-angle, comitant hyperdeviation with no muscle paresis. Sensory evaluation demonstrated peripheral fusion and reduced stereoacuity. Neither prism correction nor manipulation of the refractive errors corrected the diplopia. A partially occlusive foil (Bangerter) of density ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 was placed in front of the affected eye to restore stable, single vision.

Results  The Bangerter foil eliminated the diplopia in all patients. Two patients elected not to wear the foil; 1 patient was afraid of becoming dependent, and the other was bothered by the visual blur. Visual acuity in the affected eye was reduced on average by 3 lines. All patients maintained the same level of sensory fusion, with only 2 having reduced stereoacuity. Symptoms returned when the foil was removed or its density was reduced.

Conclusion  Low-density Bangerter foils provide an effective, inexpensive, and aesthetically acceptable management for refractory binocular diplopia induced by macular pathology, allowing peripheral fusion to be maintained.


From the Departments of Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital (Drs Silverberg, Veronneau-Troutman, Wald, Schlossman, and Medow and Ms Schuler) and New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center (Drs Veronneau-Troutman and Medow), New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Diplopia Secondary to Aniseikonia Associated With Macular Disease
Nancy M. Benegas, James Egbert, W. Keith Engel, and Burton J. Kushner
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(7):896-899.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(7):993-994.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Management of Binocular Diplopia Due to Maculopathy with Combined Bangerter Filter and Fresnel Prism
Iacobucci et al.
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2009;59:93-97.
ABSTRACT  

"Was It Something I Said?": Finding Retinal Pathology Without Actually Examining the Retina
Arnoldi and Reynolds
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2008;58:70-75.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.