You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 7, July 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Strabismus
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Diplopia Secondary to Aniseikonia Associated With Macular Disease

Nancy M. Benegas, MD; James Egbert, MD; W. Keith Engel, MD; Burton J. Kushner, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:896-899.

Objective  To provide an explanation for diplopia and the inability to fuse in some patients with macular disease.

Methods  We identified 7 patients from our practices who had binocular diplopia concurrent with epiretinal membranes or vitreomacular traction. A review of the medical records of all patients was performed. In addition to complete ophthalmologic and orthoptic examinations, evaluation of aniseikonia using the Awaya New Aniseikonia Tests (Handaya Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was performed on all patients.

Results  All patients were referred for troublesome diplopia. Six of the patients had epiretinal membranes and 1 had vitreomacular traction. All 7 patients had aniseikonia, ranging from 5% to 18%. In 5 of the patients the image in the involved eye was larger, and in the other 2 patients it was smaller than in the fellow eye. All patients had concomitant small-angle strabismus and at least initially did not fuse when the deviation was offset with a prism. Response to optical management and retinal surgery was variable.

Conclusions  Aniseikonia caused by separation or compression of photoreceptors can be a contributing factor to the existence of diplopia and the inability to fuse in patients with macular disease. Concomitant small-angle strabismus and the inability to fuse with prisms may lead the clinician to the incorrect diagnosis of central disruption of fusion. Surgical intervention does not necessarily improve the aniseikonia.


From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Drs Benegas and Kushner); the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Drs Egbert and Engel); and the Park Nicollet Clinic, Minneapolis (Dr Engel). The authors have no financial interest in the Awaya New Aniseikona Tests (Handaya Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).


RELATED ARTICLES

Nonsurgical Management of Binocular Diplopia Induced by Macular Pathology
Mark Silverberg, Eileen Schuler, Suzanne Veronneau-Troutman, Kenneth Wald, Abraham Schlossman, and Norman Medow
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(7):900-903.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(7):993-994.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validity and Repeatability of a New Test for Aniseikonia
Antona et al.
IOVS 2007;48:58-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aniseikonia associated with epiretinal membranes
Ugarte and Williamson
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1576-1580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.