You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 4, April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Vitreoretinal Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Histopathological Features of Vitreous Removed at Macular Hole Surgery

Srinivas R. Sadda, MD; Peter A. Campochiaro, MD; Eugene de Juan, Jr, MD; Julia A. Haller, MD; W. Richard Green, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:478-484.

Objective  To describe the histopathological features of the vitreous removed at surgery for macular holes in 200 consecutive cases.

Methods  The complete vitrectomy specimen in each case was concentrated by means of cellulose membrane filters and stained for light microscopy. The cases were organized into 5 categories: (1) all cases (N=200), (2) eyes without previous vitrectomy (n=174), (3) eyes with previous vitrectomy (n=26), (4) idiopathic cases (n=143), and (5) traumatic (accidental or surgical) cases (n=31). The type and frequency of tissue fragments present in the vitreous were determined for each case.

Results  Fibrocellular and cellular membrane fragments were found in a minority of cases in all categories. Retinal fragments were a rare finding, present in only 4 cases. Inflammation was present in 57 (28.5%) of all cases.

Conclusions  The absence of fibrocellular and cellular membrane fragments in the majority of cases suggests that mechanisms other than cellular proliferation are important in the pathogenesis of macular holes. These fragments are, however, the likely histopathological correlate of the opercula that are often observed clinically in patients with macular hole. Opercula rarely if ever contain retinal fragments, and thus are better termed pseudo-opercula, as has been previously suggested. The cellular proliferation and inflammation that are observed in some of the cases are likely a secondary or reactive process.


From the W. Richard Green Eye Pathology Laboratory (Drs Sadda and Green) and the Vitreoretinal Service (Drs Campochiaro, de Juan, and Haller), Wilmer Eye Institute, and Department of Pathology (Drs Sadda and Green), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(4):555.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The macular hole: histopathologic studies.
Green
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:317-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perifoveal Vitreous Detachment Is the Primary Pathogenic Event in Idiopathic Macular Hole Formation
Johnson et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:215-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.