
Severity and Stability of Glaucoma
Patient Perception Compared With Objective Measurement
Ananth C. Viswanathan, FRCOphth;
Andrew I. McNaught, FRCOphth;
Darmalingun Poinoosawmy;
Luigi Fontana, MD;
David P. Crabb, PhD;
Fred W. Fitzke, PhD;
Roger A. Hitchings, FRCOphth
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:450-454.
Objective To elucidate the relationship between the subjective assessment in patients with glaucoma of (1) the severity of their visual loss, and (2) any deterioration in their visual function and their objective visual fields as measured by computed perimetry.
Design First, patients completed a questionnaire relating to perceived visual disability and underwent binocular visual field testing. Second, a separate group of patients answered a question about perceived visual deterioration: their monocular visual field tests were analyzed retrospectively by pointwise linear regression to establish stability or deterioration.
Setting The Glaucoma Service of a specialist eye hospital, which is a tertiary referral center and serves the local community.
Subjects One hundred twenty-three patients with glaucoma including 62 for the severity arm of the study and 61 for the progression arm.
Main Outcome Measures Questionnaire responses, Esterman binocular disability score, and objective visual field deterioration.
Results Questions strongly associated with Esterman binocular disability scores related to bumping into things, problems with stairs, and finding things that have been dropped. There was a strong association between perceived visual deterioration and measured bilateral visual field deterioration (P<.01).
Conclusions There is a strong association between some types of perceived visual disability and the severity of binocular field loss. A patient who notices gradual visual deterioration is twice as likely to have bilateral visual field deterioration as not. The findings in this sample of patients with mild-to-moderate glaucoma challenge the belief that glaucoma is an insidious process in which the symptoms do not appear until the end stage of the disease.
From the Institute of Ophthalmology (Drs Viswanathan, McNaught, Crabb, and Fitzke) and Moorfields Eye Hospital (Mr Poinoosawmy and Drs Fontana and Hitchings).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(4):555.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Functional Consequences of Glaucoma for Eye-Hand Coordination
Kotecha et al.
IOVS 2009;50:203-213.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Profiling of WDR36 Missense Variants in German Patients with Glaucoma
Pasutto et al.
IOVS 2008;49:270-274.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Examination of Different Pointwise Linear Regression Methods for Determining Visual Field Progression
Gardiner and Crabb
IOVS 2002;43:1400-1407.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Correlation of the Binocular Visual Field with Patient Assessment of Vision
Jampel et al.
IOVS 2002;43:1059-1067.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:238-242.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|