You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 10, October 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Pulmonary Diseases
 •Asthma
 •Immunology
 •Allergy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Latanoprost and Respiratory Function in Asthmatic Patients

Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Evaluation

Jan Hedner, MD, PhD; Bernt Everts, MD; Christina Ström Möller, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1305-1309.

Objective  To evaluate the effects of single and multiple administrations of the ocular hypotensive drug latanoprost on respiratory function, asthma symptoms, and use of asthma medication in patients with bronchial asthma.

Methods  Twenty-four stable patients with asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 70% to 90% of predicted and a minimum of 10% reversibility after inhalation of albuterol sulfate) with no previous exposure to inhaled corticosteroids participated in this randomized, double-masked crossover trial. Patients received latanoprost, 0.005%, or placebo, 1 drop per day, in each eye during two 6-day treatment periods separated by a 2-week washout period. Acute latanoprost or placebo provocation, methacholine chloride airway reactivity, and {beta}2-stimulator reversibility tests were performed.

Main Outcome Measures  Morning and evening peak expiratory flow, spirometric performance throughout treatment periods and during different provocation tests, asthma symptoms, and use of asthma medications were evaluated.

Results  There were no statistically significant differences between treatments in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, scored daytime and nocturnal asthma symptoms, or daily consumption of asthma medication. During placebo provocation, there was a small increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second that was not seen during latanoprost provocation. This small difference (-0.09 L) was statistically significant but without clinical importance.

Conclusions  Resting and provoked airway function and asthma symptoms were unaffected by latanoprost treatment in patients with asthma with no previous exposure to corticosteroids. Latanoprost can be used in patients with glaucoma and concomitant bronchial asthma.


From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg (Drs Hedner and Everts); and Pharmacia & Upjohn, Stockholm (Dr Ström Möller), Sweden. The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the products mentioned.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Effect of Latanoprost on Regional Blood Flow and Capillary Permeability in the Monkey Eye
Johan Stjernschantz, Göran Selén, Maria Astin, Maritha Karlsson, and Bahram Resul
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(10):1363-1367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(10):1452.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

From PGF2{{alpha}}-Isopropyl Ester to Latanoprost: A Review of the Development of Xalatan The Proctor Lecture
Stjernschantz
IOVS 2001;42:1134-1145.
FULL TEXT  

No Relationship Between Advertising and Editorial Acceptance
Hoffman and McDonnell
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:308-308.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.