You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 9, September 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Enucleation
 •Dermatology
 •Granulomas
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Intraorbital Implants After Enucleation and Their Complications

A 10-Year Review

Nancy J. Christmas, MD; Craig D. Gordon; Timothy G. Murray, MD; David Tse, MD; Thomas Johnson, MD; Scott Garonzik; Joan M. O'Brien, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1199-1203.

Background  Many different types of orbital implants have been used after enucleation. Associated complications such as infection, exposure, extrusion, and ptosis have been reported.

Objective  To describe 342 consecutive patients who underwent enucleation with intraorbital implant placement at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla, during the past 10.5 years and their complications.

Methods  Medical records of orbital implantation after enucleation performed by 3 surgeons (T.G.M., D.T., and T.J.) were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, ocular diagnosis, previous ophthalmic surgery, implant characteristics, and postoperative complications were described in all patients, with a minimum of 2 months' follow-up, using a standardized format.

Results  Eleven complications were observed in 7 patients. Four patients had exposure of the implant, and 1 of these patients developed associated infection. Three patients developed pyogenic granulomas, 1 patient developed ptosis requiring surgical intervention, 1 patient had long-term orbital discomfort, and 1 patient developed an inclusion cyst.

Conclusion  Complications after enucleation with orbital implant placement are minimal and are observed with both porous and acrylic orbital implants.


From Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Drs Christmas, Murray, Tse, and Johnson and Mr Gordon); SNG Prosthetic Eye Institute, Boca Raton, Fla (Mr Garonzik); and the Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco (Dr O'Brien).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mechanisms and Treatment of Extruding Intraconal Implants: Socket Aging and Tissue Restitution (the "Cactus Syndrome")
Sagoo and Rose
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1616-1620.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Staining of the Tenon Capsule With Trypan Blue During Enucleation Surgery
Cheung et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1125-1126.
FULL TEXT  

Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure
Sagoo and Olver
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:942-946.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Magnetically Integrated Microporous Implant: Safety and Efficacy of Secondary Posting
Escalona-Benz et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1596-1600.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Design of a Magnetically Integrated Microporous Implant
Murray et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1259-1262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Efficacy and Complications: Primary Pediatric Orbital Implants After Enucleation
Christmas et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:503-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.