This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (30)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Laser Surgery  • Surgery  • Laser Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic

Michael W. Ulbig, MD; Georgios Mangouritsas, MD; H.-Hermann Rothbächer, MD; A. M. Peter Hamilton, FRCS, FRCOphth; J. Dominic McHugh, MD, FRCS, FRCOphth

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1465-1469.

Objective  To investigate the effects of drainage of premacular subhyaloid hemorrhage into the vitreous with an Nd:YAG laser in a large series of patients with long-term follow-up.

Methods  A retrospective review was conducted on 21 eyes with a circumscribed premacular subhyaloid hemorrhage of various causes. These eyes were treated with a pulsed Nd:YAG laser to drain the entrapped blood into the vitreous. The period of review ranged from 12 to 32 months (mean, 22 months).

Results  In 16 eyes, visual acuity improved within 1 month. Four eyes had persistent, dense, nonclearing vitreous opacity for at least 3 months and finally required vitrectomy. One clotted hemorrhage did not drain into the vitreous. Final visual outcome was determined by the underlying diagnosis, such as Valsalva retinopathy (7 eyes), diabetic retinopathy (7 eyes), branch retinal vein occlusion (4 eyes), and retinal macroaneurysm, Terson syndrome, or blood dyscrasia (1 eye each). Eyes with Valsalva retinopathy fared the best. Complications included a macular hole in 1 eye and a retinal detachment from a retinal break in a myopic patient.

Conclusions  Drainage of premacular subhyaloid hemorrhage into the vitreous with an Nd:YAG laser is a viable treatment alternative for eyes with recent bleeding. However, a macular hole and a retinal detachment were observed as complications. Thus, to establish Nd:YAG laser treatment as a routine procedure, the risks and benefits have to be weighed in a randomized trial and compared with those of deferral of treatment or primary vitrectomy.

From the University Eye Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany (Drs Ulbig, Mangouritsas, and Rothbächer); Moorfields Eye Hospital (Dr Hamilton), and Eye Department, King's College Hospital (Dr McHugh), London, England.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Subhyaloidal and macular haemorrhage: localisation and treatment strategies
Mennel
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:850-852.
FULL TEXT  

Sub-inner limiting membrane haemorrhage: causes and treatment with vitrectomy
De Maeyer et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:869-872.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delayed Nd:YAG Laser Membranotomy for Traumatic Premacular Hemorrhage
Aralikatti et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1503-1503.
FULL TEXT  

Neodymium:YAG laser treatment for a premacular haemorrhage in a T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma patient.
Gelston and Ciardella
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1329-1330.
FULL TEXT  

Subhyaloid haemorrhage from proliferative diabetic retinopathy after Nd:YAG laser iridotomy
HAMUSH and SCHAKAL
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1432d-1432.
FULL TEXT  

Subhyaloid or subinternal limiting membrane haemorrhage in meningococcal meningitis
SUNG et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1203e-1203.
FULL TEXT