You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 10, October 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Eye Injuries/ Ocular Trauma
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ocular Trauma Following Penetrating Keratoplasty

Incidence, Outcome, and Postoperative Recommendations

Uri Rehany, MD, FACS; Shimon Rumelt, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1282-1286.

Background  The surgical wound after penetrating keratoplasty is more vulnerable to contusive trauma than the intact cornea.

Objectives  To assess the incidence of ocular trauma following penetrating keratoplasty, and to evaluate its causative factors, management, and visual outcome.

Setting  Tertiary referral facility in a fairly closed population.

Methods  Retrospective study assessing ocular injuries of all 559 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty in the center between September 1986 and March 1993.

Results  Fourteen (2.5%) of 559 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, over a period of 78 months, suffered surgical wound dehiscence because of contusive ocular trauma. The mean age of the patients (30.6 years) was significantly lower (P<.001) than that of the total number of patients who received transplants (49 years). The interval between transplantation and trauma ranged from 2 weeks to 2 years (mean interval, 6.7 months). In 11 of the 14 patients the trauma occurred prior to removal of sutures. Globe rupture occurred at the donor-recipient interface in all of the patients, accompanied by vitreous and lens loss in 8 patients (57%). In 2 patients (14%) trauma included disruption of retinal tissue resulting in poor visual outcome. The trauma occurred most often at home (in 7 patients). After follow-up periods of 1 to 6 years (mean, 29 months), the corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/120 to 20/20 in 12 patients (86%).

Conclusions  Ocular injury following penetrating keratoplasty is not a rare event. Since corneal graft wound is vulnerable to ocular trauma, we recommend the constant use of protective eyewear and periodically instruct the patients on the long-term vulnerability of the graft wound. Patients should be repeatedly cautioned against high-risk environments and strenuous activity.


From the Department of Ophthalmology, Western Galilee–Nahariya Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Resuturing following penetrating keratoplasty: a retrospective analysis
Jeganathan et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:893-895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Lamellar Wound Configuration for Penetrating Keratoplasty Surgery
Busin
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:260-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.