This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (65)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Laser Surgery  • Refractive Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Alaa A. Ghaith, MD; Jan Daniel, MD; R. Doyle Stulting, MD, PhD; Keith P. Thompson, MD; Michael Lynn, MS

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:12-18.

Objectives  To study the effects of radial keratotomy (RK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on contrast sensitivity and glare disability using 4 different devices, and to correlate subjective complaints with objective scores of visual performance.

Methods  Preoperative contrast sensitivity for 30 eyes undergoing RK and 30 eyes undergoing PRK was compared with contrast sensitivity at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using the CSV 1000, MCT (Multivision Contrast Tester) 8000, and Pelli-Robson chart. The BAT (Brightness Acuity Tester) and MCT 8000 were used to test for daytime and nighttime glare disability, respectively. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, a questionnaire was administered to assess visual performance subjectively.

Results  Contrast sensitivity decreased after RK and PRK up to the sixth postoperative month, while glare disability was significantly increased at 1 month after PRK as determined by the MCT 8000 and the BAT, and at the third and sixth months after RK using the MCT 8000. Compared with RK, PRK significantly decreased contrast sensitivity as measured with the MCT 8000 at all spatial frequencies 1 month postoperatively. No significant difference in visual performance between patients undergoing RK and PRK was observed with the CSV 1000, the Pelli-Robson chart, or the BAT up to 6 months postoperatively. No consistent difference was found between glare disability scores of patients undergoing RK and PRK when measured with the MCT 8000. Subjective reports of problems with night driving and blurring correlated only with glare disability scores of the MCT 80003 months after RK.

Conclusions  Both RK and PRK reduce contrast sensitivity and cause glare disability; however, the relative effect is highly dependent on the time postoperative testing is performed and the instrument used for testing. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability, as measured by the instruments used in this study, do not accurately reflect patients' subjective assessment of visual performance in daily life.

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt (Dr Ghaith); and the Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine (Drs Daniel, Stulting, and Thompson), and Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Mr Lynn), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Time Course of Changes in Ocular Higher-Order Aberrations and Contrast Sensitivity after Overnight Orthokeratology
Hiraoka et al.
IOVS 2008;49:4314-4320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contrast Sensitivity Function and Ocular Higher-Order Aberrations following Overnight Orthokeratology
Hiraoka et al.
IOVS 2007;48:550-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the Design of the Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test
Arditi
IOVS 2005;46:2225-2229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement of stray light and glare: comparison of Nyktotest, Mesotest, stray light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter
van Rijn et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:345-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ocular Higher-Order Aberrations and Contrast Sensitivity after Conventional Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Yamane et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3986-3990.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research
Pesudovs et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:11-16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual performance after interface haemorrhage during laser in situ keratomileusis
Vajpayee et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:717-719.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond Snellen Acuity: The Assessment of Visual Function After Refractive Surgery
McLeod
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1371-1373.
FULL TEXT  

Ocular Optical Aberrations After Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
Seiler et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:17-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Refractive Surgery: What Is the Appropriate Baseline?
Belin
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1104-1105.
FULL TEXT