You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A 1-year study of brimonidine twice daily in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. A controlled, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Chronic Brimonidine Study Group

J. S. Schuman, B. Horwitz, N. T. Choplin, R. David, D. Albracht and K. Chen
New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass., USA. jss@mediaone.net

OBJECTIVE: Brimonidin tartrate is a highly selective alpha 2-agonist. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of 0.2% brimonidine administered twice daily for 1 year in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: The study design was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled comparison clinical trial. Subjects instilled 0.2% brimonidine or 0.5% timolol maleate twice daily for 12 months. Subjects were examined at baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. A subset of subjects was examined at week 2. RESULTS: Of 443 subjects enrolled in this study, 374 met the entry criteria; 186 received brimonidine and 188 received timolol. Brimonidine-treated subjects showed an overall mean peak reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) of 6.5 mm Hg; timolol-treated subjects had a mean peak reduction in IOP of 6.1 mm Hg. Brimonidine lowered mean peak IOP significantly more than timolol at week 2 and month 3 (P < .03); no significant difference was observed between the groups for this variable at other visits throughout the 1-year course of the study. No evidence of tachyphylaxis was seen in either group. Allergy was seen in 9% of subjects treated with brimonidine. Dry mouth was more common in the brimonidine-treated group than in the timolol-treated group (33.0% vs 19.4%), but complaints of burning and stinging were more common in the timolol-treated group (41.9%) than in the brimonidine-treated patients (28.1%). Headache, fatigue, and drowsiness were similar in the 2 groups. In general, the tolerance to medication was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Brimonidine is safe and effective in lowering IOP in glaucomatous eyes. Brimonidine provides a sustained long-term ocular hypotensive effect, is well tolerated, and has a low rate of allergic response.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Topical Clonidine versus Brimonidine on Choroidal Blood Flow and Intraocular Pressure during Squatting
Weigert et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4220-4225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduced Ocular Allergy With Fixed-Combination 0.2% Brimonidine-0.5% Timolol--Reply
Sherwood et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:717-718.
FULL TEXT  

Twice-Daily 0.2% Brimonidine-0.5% Timolol Fixed-Combination Therapy vs Monotherapy With Timolol or Brimonidine in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A 12-Month Randomized Trial.
Sherwood et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1230-1238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. A six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe
Garcia-Sanchez et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:877-883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aqueous Humor Flow in Normal Human Eyes Treated With Brimonidine and Dorzolamide, Alone and in Combination
Tsukamoto and Larsson
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:190-193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systemic Side Effects of Ophthalmic Drops
Levy and Zadok
CLIN PEDIATR 2004;43:99-101.
ABSTRACT  

Should {beta} blockers be abandoned as initial monotherapy in chronic open angle glaucoma? The controversy
Goldberg et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:691-695.
FULL TEXT  

Neuroprotection of Retinal Ganglion Cells by Brimonidine in Rats with Laser-Induced Chronic Ocular Hypertension
WoldeMussie et al.
IOVS 2001;42:2849-2855.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aqueous Humor Flow in Normal Human Eyes Treated With Brimonidine and Timolol, Alone and in Combination
Larsson
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:492-495.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Early Effects of Brimonidine and Apraclonidine as Topical Ocular Hypotensive Agents
Maus et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:586-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pressure or Progression?
Burnstein et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:417-419.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Efficacy of Apraclonidine and Brimonidine as Aqueous Suppressants in Humans
Schadlu et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1441-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.