Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks

L. Brigatti, K. Nouri-Mahdavi, M. Weitzman and J. Caprioli
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate computerized neural networks to determine visual field progression in patients with glaucoma. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three series of Octopus G1 visual fields of 181 patients with glaucoma were collected. Each series was composed of 4 or more reliable visual fields from patients who had previously undergone automated perimetry. The visual fields were independently evaluated in a masked fashion by 3 experienced observers (K.N.-M, M.W., and J.C.) and were judged to show progression based on the agreement of 2 observers. The stable and progressed series were matched for mean defect at baseline. The threshold data were submitted to a back propagation neural network that was trained to classify each series as stable or progressed. Two thirds of the data were used for the training and the remaining one third to test the performance of the network. This was repeated 3 times to classify all of the series (changing the training and test series). RESULTS: Fifty-nine series of visual fields showed progression and 151 were judged stable. Neural network sensitivity was 73% and specificity was 88% (threshold for progression = 0.5). The concordance of the neural network with the observers was good (0.50 < or = kappa > or = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: A neural network can be trained to recognize visual field progression in good concordance with experienced observers. Neural networks may be used to aid the physician in the evaluation of glaucomatous visual field progression.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessing Visual Field Clustering Schemes Using Machine Learning Classifiers in Standard Perimetry
Boden et al.
IOVS 2007;48:5582-5590.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and Comparison of Automated Classifiers for Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography
Huang and Chen
IOVS 2005;46:4121-4129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unsupervised Machine Learning with Independent Component Analysis to Identify Areas of Progression in Glaucomatous Visual Fields
Sample et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3684-3692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Scoring of Visual Field Measured through Humphrey Perimetry: Principal Component Varimax Rotation Followed by Validated Cluster Analysis
Nordmann et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3169-3176.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Neural Networks and Linear Discriminant Functions for Glaucoma Detection Using Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy of the Optic Disc
Bowd et al.
IOVS 2002;43:3444-3454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Machine Learning Classifiers for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Standard Automated Perimetry
Goldbaum et al.
IOVS 2002;43:162-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of the Pattern- and Total Deviation-Based Glaucoma Change Probability Programs
Katz
IOVS 2000;41:1012-1016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methodological Variations in Estimating Apparent Progressive Visual Field Loss in Clinical Trials of Glaucoma Treatment
Katz et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1137-1142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT