You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 5, May 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optic Nerve Avulsion

Bradley S. Foster, MD; Glenville A. March, MD; Mark J. Lucarelli, MD; Nasrollah Samiy, MD; Simmons Lessell, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(5):623-630.


Abstract

Objective
To characterize the presentation, role of diagnostic imaging, and course in patients with optic nerve avulsion.

Methods
A retrospective review of medical records of all 6 patients with optic nerve avulsion who were seen at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, from January 1, 1991, to July 31, 1995.

Results
The initial visual acuity ranged from 20/100 to no light perception. All 6 patients underwent neuroimaging, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both. B-scan ultrasonography was performed on 4 patients, and the condition of 1 patient was evaluated with color Doppler ultrasonography to assess the optic nerve vasculature. In 1 patient, a computed tomographic scan was suggestive of an optic nerve avulsion. Neuroimaging in the other 5 patients, including 2 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging, failed to demonstrate an avulsion. During a follow-up period of up to 25 months, 4 patients showed no improvement in visual acuity, 1 patient improved from no light perception to bare light perception, and 1 patient improved from 20/100 to 20/25.

Conclusions
These data suggest that final visual outcome was dependent on initial postinjury visual acuity. Neuroimaging, B-scans, and Doppler ultrasonography were usually not helpful in establishing the presence of optic nerve avulsion, although they may be useful in evaluating comorbid conditions.



Author Affiliations

From the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr March is now with the Division of Ophthalmology at Charles R. Drew University, Los Angeles, Calif, and Dr Lucarelli is now with the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Computer modelling study of the mechanism of optic nerve injury in blunt trauma
Cirovic et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:778-783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optic Nerve Avulsion
Espaillat and To
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:540-541.
FULL TEXT  

Avulsion of the Optic Nerve Head After Orbital Trauma
Tsopelas and Arvanitis
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:394-394.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.