Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma

S. D. Smith, J. Katz and H. A. Quigley
Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 21205-2103, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in persons with glaucomatous visual field loss. SUBJECTS: Subjects from a retrospective study of visual field progression who underwent cataract extraction during follow-up were identified. Subjects came from the glaucoma service of a hospital-based tertiary referral center. METHODS: Subjects had at least 7 Humphrey 24-2 or 30-2 visual fields over 5 years or more, with an abnormal glaucoma hemifield test result on the first 2 examinations. Visual field data were transferred to a microcomputer and comparison of the visual fields immediately before and after cataract extraction was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes of 50 subjects (mean age, 71.8 years) were included in the analysis. A mean improvement in mean deviation (MD) of 1.68 dB (P<.001), and a mean worsening in corrected pattern SD (CPSD) of 0.54 dB (P=.09) was observed. The mean unweighted change in threshold in the 52 points of program 24-2 was 1.58 dB, corresponding to a 43.9% increase in sensitivity. A significant correlation between improvement in visual acuity and improvement in MD was also found. A mean increase in CPSD of 1.61 dB (P=.005) occurred in subjects with dense scotomas (minimum threshold value < or = 5 dB) and preoperative CPSD of 8 dB or less. CONCLUSIONS: In persons with glaucomatous visual field defects, cataract extraction produces only a modest improvement in MD. After cataract surgery, the CPSD index worsened in many subjects with dense scotomas. This suggests that the development of cataract can mask progressive glaucomatous visual field loss in such persons.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma
Chauhan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008;92:569-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating the Rate of Progressive Visual Field Damage in Those with Open-Angle Glaucoma, from Cross-Sectional Data
Broman et al.
IOVS 2008;49:66-76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cataract Extraction in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: Incidence, Risk Factors, and the Effect of Cataract Progression and Extraction on Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes
Musch et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1694-1700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma
Siddiqui et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1569-1571.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Cataract Extraction on the Visual Fields of Patients With Glaucoma
Carrillo et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:929-932.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Development of the LV Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire: A Measure of Functional Vision Performance of Visually Impaired Children
Gothwal et al.
IOVS 2003;44:4131-4139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry and Optical Defocus
Anderson and Johnson
IOVS 2003;44:4147-4152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Self-Assessment Instrument Designed for Measuring Independent Mobility in RP Patients: Generalizability to Glaucoma Patients
Turano et al.
IOVS 2002;43:2874-2881.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, 6: Effect of Cataract on Visual Field and Visual Acuity
AGIS Investigators
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1639-1652.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fellow Eye Prognosis in Patients With Severe Visual Field Loss in 1 Eye From Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma
Chen and Bhandari
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:473-478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT