You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 11, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of dorzolamide and timolol as suppressors of aqueous humor flow in humans

L. Wayman, L. I. Larsson, T. Maus, A. Alm and R. Brubaker
Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minn., USA.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the effectiveness of topical 2% dorzolamide hydrochloride (Trusopt, Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ) as a suppressor of aqueous humor flow in the human eye as compared with the effectiveness of 0.5% timolol maleate (Timoptic, Merck & Co Inc) and to measure the additivity of the 2 drugs. DESIGN: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of 40 human subjects was carried out in 2 academic centers (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, and University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden). The rate of aqueous flow was measured from 8 AM to 4 PM by means of fluorophotometry after administration of doses of each drug singly and both drugs together. RESULTS: Dorzolamide reduced aqueous flow from 3.07 +/- 0.63 microL/min (mean +/- SD) to 2.53 +/- 0.60 microL/min, a reduction of 18% (P < .001). Timolol reduced aqueous flow from the same beginning rate to 1.64 +/- 0.35 microL/min, a reduction of 47% (P < .001). The inhibitory effect of timolol was 2.6 times the inhibitory effect of dorzolamide (P < .001). The 2 drugs were almost completely additive, and together reduced the flow to 1.37 +/- 0.33 microL/min, a reduction of 55%. Consistent effects were observed on intraocular pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Timolol is more effective than dorzolamide as a suppressor of aqueous humor flow in the normal human eye. Timolol and dorzolamide are additive in their effects, both on aqueous flow and intraocular pressure.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Aqueous Humor Flow in Normal Human Eyes Treated With Brimonidine and Dorzolamide, Alone and in Combination
Tsukamoto and Larsson
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:190-193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aqueous Humor Flow in Normal Human Eyes Treated With Brimonidine and Timolol, Alone and in Combination
Larsson
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:492-495.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A comparison of latanoprost and dorzolamide in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a 3 month, randomised study
O'Donoghue and the UK and Ireland Latanoprost Study Group
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;84:579-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Early Effects of Brimonidine and Apraclonidine as Topical Ocular Hypotensive Agents
Maus et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:586-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Ocular Hypotensive Mechanisms and Additivity of Antiglaucoma Drugs in Humans
Kaufman
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:673-674.
FULL TEXT  

Additive Effect of Dorzolamide on Aqueous Humor Flow in Patients Receiving Long-term Treatment With Timolol
Wayman et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1438-1440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dorzolamide and Timolol as Suppressors of Aqueous Humor Flow
Wegner et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1133-1133.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.