You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 8, August 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A 90-Day Study of the Efficacy and Side Effects of 0.25% and 0.5% Apraclonidine vs 0.5% Timolol

William C. Stewart, MD; Robert Laibovitz, MD; Barry Horwitz, MD; Robert H. Stewart, MD; Robert Ritch, MD; Michael Kottler, MD; Apraclonidine Primary Therapy Study Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(8):938-942.


Abstract

Objective
To compare long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% apraclonidine hydrochloride with 0.5% timolol maleate.

Design
Multicenter, randomized, double-masked trial. Adult patients of either sex diagnosed as having open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were enrolled following appropriate washout from all ocular hypotensive medications. Morning IOPs of 22 to 35 mm Hg were required for entry. Patients received 0.25% or 0.5% apraclonidine 3 times a day or 0.5% timolol twice a day for 90 days. Intraocular pressure was measured at 8 AM (before morning dosing) and at 4 PM (8 hours after dosing) on days 1, 30, and 90, and only at 8 AM on day 14.

Results
All 3 medications significantly reduced IOP from baseline at all observation times (P<.001): 0.5% apraclonidine reduced IOP more than 0.25% apraclonidine; no significant difference was observed between 0.5% apraclonidine and 0.5% timolol 8 hours after dosing on days 1, 30, and 90; and a significant difference (P<.05) in favor of 0.5% timolol over 0.25% apraclonidine was observed 8 hours after dosing on day 30. At all morning visits following evening dosing, 0.5% timolol significantly reduced IOP more than both concentrations of apraclonidine.

Conclusions
Both 0.25% and 0.5% apraclonidine significantly reduce IOP when used as primary ocular hypotensive medication. Although 0.25% and 0.5% apraclonidine reduce IOP to a similar degree as 0.5% timolol 8 hours after morning dosing, neither concentration is as effective for reducing morning IOP after evening dosing.



Author Affiliations

From Pharmaceutical Research Corporation, Charleston, SC (Dr W. C. Stewart); Eye Research Associates, Austin, Tex (Dr Laibovitz) and Houston, Tex (Dr Horwitz); Houston Eye Associates (Dr R. H. Stewart); New York (NY) Eye and Ear Infirmary (Dr Ritch); and Rocky Mountain Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr Kottler). Participants of the Apraclonidine Primary Therapy Study Group are listed on page 940. The authors have no proprietary interest in apraclonidine or timolol.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The sensitivity and specificity of 0.5% apraclonidine in the diagnosis of oculosympathetic paresis
Koc et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1442-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ocular Effects of Apraclonidine in Horner Syndrome
Morales et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:951-954.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

{beta}-Blocker-Induced Complications and the Patient With Glaucoma: Newer Treatments to Help Reduce Systemic Adverse Events
Stewart and Garrison
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:221-226.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.