This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Clinical Evaluation vs Centralized Grading of Fundus Photographs

The Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group in collaboration with the AIDS Clinical Trials Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(7):791-805.

Abstract
Background
In the Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis Trial, time to first progression of newly diagnosed CMV retinitis was similar in the 2 treatment groups but was shorter when assessed by grading of fundus photographs at a central reading center than when assessed at the participating clinical centers. This report describes the extent and causes of this disagreement and considers the implications of the findings for clinical practice and future research.

Methods
Clinical findings and photographic gradings were compared for extent and activity of retinitis at baseline and during follow-up. In selected cases of disagreement, the photographs and summaries of gradings and clinical findings were reviewed concurrently to determine the cause of disagreement.

Results
Movement of the border of retinitis was observed sooner and activity of the border was considered to have increased more often at the reading center than at the clinical centers. Disagreements on time to first progression were more frequent when degree of border movement was small (odds ratios [ORs] for several comparisons ranged from 1.7 to 5.2), when border activity was judged to have decreased or remained the same since the preceding visit (OR, 2.0-193), and when retinitis at baseline did not involve zone 1 (the area within 1 disc diameter of the disc or within 2 disc diameters of the center of the macula [OR, 1.4-3.6]). There were 2 important causes of disagreement between clinical center and reading center. First, difficulty was encountered clinically in recognizing retinitis border movement in the absence of an obvious increase in border activity. Second, the reading center used a threshold for border movement small enough to be crossed by an initial expansion of retinitis borders occurring within 2 to 5 weeks of enrollment in some patients who were responding favorably to treatment (in that retinitis was becoming inactive and showed no further progression for many weeks).

Conclusions
Comparisons of photographs from the current visit with those from several previous visits may increase clinicians' abilities to detect progression promptly. The use of additional outcome measures by reading centers, such as border movement of 1500 µm or more and change in area of retina involved by retinitis, may provide more accurate and useful comparisons of treatments. In making such comparisons, centralized photographic grading has the advantages of greater reproducibility and lesser risk of observer bias.

Footnotes
All individuals participating in the conduct of this study are listed on page 804 of this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

CNS MR and CT Findings Associated with a Clinical Presentation of Herpetic Acute Retinal Necrosis and Herpetic Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis: Five HIV-Infected and One Non-Infected Patients
Bert et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1722-1729.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual Loss in Patients With Cytomegalovirus Retinitis and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Before Widespread Availability of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
Holbrook et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:99-107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Photographic Measures of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis as Surrogates for Visual Outcomes in Treated Patients
Holbrook et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:554-563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for Advancement of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Holbrook et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1196-1204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Diseases in Patients With AIDS in the Era of Potent Antiretroviral Therapy: Recommendations of an International Panel
Whitley et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:957-969.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical vs Photographic Assessment of Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis: Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial Report 8
Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research G
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:848-855.
ABSTRACT  

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and the Eye--1996
Jabs
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:863-866.
ABSTRACT