You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Associations Between Siblings for Esotropia and Exotropia

Marvin J. Podgor, PhD; Nancy A. Remaley, MS; Emily Chew, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(6):739-744.


Abstract

Objective
To quantify familial aggregation of esotropia and exotropia in children examined in a large multicenter study.

Methods
Pregnant women and their children were examined in the Collaborative Perinatal Project of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Md. Strabismus was evaluated in the children during follow-up examinations up to the age of 7 years. The second-order generalized estimating equations approach to logistic regression was used to estimate familial aggregation of esotropia and exotropia.

Results
For any pair of siblings, the odds for one sibling having esotropia more than doubled when the other sibling had esotropia. For exotropia, there were differences in sibling associations based on birth relationships. In particular, there was no statistically significant association between siblings from separate single births. On the other hand, for the pairs of siblings from multiple births (ie, twins, triplets, and quadruplets), the odds for exotropia in one sibling were increased by at least a factor of 17 when the other sibling from that birth also had exotropia. For both esotropia and exotropia, adjustment for previously identified risk factors only somewhat reduced the magnitudes of the observed associations. Limited data on zygosity showed a stronger association between monozygotic twins than between dizygotic twins.

Conclusions
There is a significant familial component in the cause of strabismus. Furthermore, there are important contributions to this familial aggregation beyond those associated with known risk factors for strabismus.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Biometry and Epidemiology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Replication of the Recessive STBMS1 Locus but with Dominant Inheritance
Rice et al.
IOVS 2009;50:3210-3217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chromosomes 4q28.3 and 7q31.2 as New Susceptibility Loci for Comitant Strabismus
Shaaban et al.
IOVS 2009;50:654-661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Basis of Congenital Strabismus
Engle
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:189-195.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The genetics of strabismus
Michaelides and Moore
J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:641-646.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A strabismus susceptibility locus on chromosome 7p
Parikh et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003;100:12283-12288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.