You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 5, May 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Aging effects on accommodation and outflow facility responses to pilocarpine in humans

M. A. Croft, M. J. Oyen, S. J. Gange, M. R. Fisher and P. L. Kaufman
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationships among age, outflow facility, and refractive and facility responses to pilocarpine in humans. METHODS: Refraction, intraocular pressure, and outflow facility were determined in 30 normal volunteers aged 20 to 75 years, by coincidence refractometry, applanation tonometry, and Schiotz tonography, respectively, before and 1 hour after a 30-microL drop of 2% or 6% pilocarpine. Simple regression of baseline facility, postpilocarpine facility, and facility change, on age and refractive change singly and jointly, was performed. Stepwise regression models and graphic conditioning plots were used to determine, for each facility variable, its relationship to age or refractive change specifically. RESULTS: Baseline outflow facility and maximum pilocarpine-induced refractive change (ie, accommodation) declined with age, but the decrease in intraocular pressure and the facility response to pilocarpine did not. After adjusting for age, for baseline facility, there was no further relationship to 6% pilocarpine-induced accommodation, and a slight residual relationship to 2% pilocarpine-induced accommodation. After adjusting for both 2% or 6% pilocarpine-induced accommodation, the relationship to age was still significant. The facility increase after 2% or 6% pilocarpine did not depend on age and/or accommodative amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: In humans, as previously described in rhesus monkeys, an age-related loss of ciliary muscle mobility may compromise the basal function of the trabecular meshwork. However, unlike monkeys, humans exhibit no loss of the intraocular pressure or outflow facility response to pilocarpine with age.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparisons between Pharmacologically and Edinger-Westphal-Stimulated Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys
Ostrin and Glasser
IOVS 2005;46:609-617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cationic Ferritin and Segmental Flow through the Trabecular Meshwork
Hann et al.
IOVS 2005;46:1-7.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aqueous Humor Dynamics and Trabecular Meshwork and Anterior Ciliary Muscle Morphologic Changes with Age in Rhesus Monkeys
Gabelt et al.
IOVS 2003;44:2118-2125.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between Aqueous Humor Protein Level and Outflow Facility in Patients with Uveitis
Ladas et al.
IOVS 2001;42:2584-2588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aging Affects the Retrobulbar Circulation Differently in Women and Men
Harris et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1076-1080.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.