You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 4, April 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Melanocytes and iris color. Electron microscopic findings

P. D. Imesch, C. D. Bindley, Z. Khademian, B. Ladd, R. Gangnon, D. M. Albert and I. H. Wallow
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively associate iris color with melanocyte pigment content. METHODS: Autopsy eyes were classified as uniform-blue, uniform-hazel, or uniform-brown or showing a darker peripupillary ring. Using electron microscopic images and computerized image analysis, area, number, and size of mature melanosomes within the perinuclear cytoplasmic area only or within perinuclear and peripheral cytoplasmic areas of the superficial stromal melanocytes combined were measured. RESULTS: Average melanosomal area per perinuclear cytoplasmic area (AMAC) and average number of melanosomes per perinuclear area (AMNC) significantly differed across iris color groups (overall P<.001). This result reflects the large difference between blue-uniform and all other color groups. A marginally significant (nominal) trend from blue-ring through brown-ring was also detected (P=.06 for AMAC and P=.07 for AMNC). The average perinuclear cytoplasmic area was larger in the central iris zone (within 1 mm around the pupillary margin) than in the intermediate iris zone (between 1 and 2 mm around the pupillary margin) (P=.002), but AMAC and AMNC did not significantly differ between zones. The average melanosome size did not differ significantly across color groups (P=.11). CONCLUSION: Differences in iris colors are at least partially attributed to variable AMNC and AMAC within superficial melanocytes.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Study of Histopathological Features of Latanoprost-Treated Irides With or Without Darkening Compared With Non-Latanoprost-Treated Irides
Albert et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:626-631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Uveal Spindle Cell Tumor of Blue-Eyed Dogs: An Immunohistochemical Study
Zarfoss et al.
Vet Pathol 2007;44:276-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Initial Intraocular Pressure Response With Topical beta-Adrenergic Antagonists and Prostaglandin Analogues in African American and White Individuals in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Mansberger et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:454-459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Study of Iridectomy Histopathologic Features of Latanoprost- and Non-Latanoprost-Treated Patients
Albert et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1680-1685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between choroidal pigmentation and posterior uveal melanoma in a white population
Harbour et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:39-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fine Structural Evaluation of the Iris After Unilateral Treatment With Latanoprost in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Trabeculectomy (The Mainz II Study)
Pfeiffer et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:23-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence of iris colour change in latanoprost treated eyes
Teus et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1085-1088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Induction of Tyrosinase Gene Transcription in Human Iris Organ Cultures Exposed to Latanoprost
Lindsey et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:853-860.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Histological Effects in the Iris After 3 Months of Latanoprost Therapy: The Mainz 1 Study
Pfeiffer et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:191-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prostaglandin-Induced Iris Color Darkening: An Experimental Model
Zhan et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1065-1068.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.