You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Familial aggregation and prevalence of myopia in the Framingham Offspring Eye Study. The Framingham Offspring Eye Study Group


National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-2510, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To examine familial relationships for myopia among siblings and the distribution of myopia in an adult population aged 23 to 78 years. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: Eye examinations were conducted in a cross-sectional study on the offspring of the Framingham Eye Study cohort. Between 1989 and 1991, 1585 persons, the offspring of 1319 parents, underwent refraction and were tested for best corrected visual acuity. A person was considered myopic if at least one eye had a spherical equivalent refractive error of at least -1.00 diopter. RESULTS: For both sexes, prevalence of myopia decreased with increasing age, from about 60% for ages 23 to 34 years to about 20% for ages 65 years and older. Among men, both age and years of education were related to myopia. Among women, age was related to myopia, but years of education were not. Age-, sex-, and education-adjusted analyses, using the second-order generalized estimating equations approach, showed a strong association of myopia between siblings. The association between siblings decreased with increasing between-siblings age difference: the estimated odds ratio was about 5 for an age difference of 2 years and half that for an age difference of 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The relative importance of genetic and environmental factors in explaining familial relationships for myopia remains unclear. Nevertheless, the large increase in myopia prevalence for more recent birth cohorts and the decrease in the strength of the between-siblings association for myopia with increasing between-siblings age difference suggest an important role for environmental factors in the cause of myopia.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Familial aggregation of myopia in the Tehran eye study: estimation of the sibling and parent offspring recurrence risk ratios
Fotouhi et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1440-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of Parental Myopia in the Progression of Myopia and Its Interaction with Treatment in COMET Children
Kurtz et al.
IOVS 2007;48:562-570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heritability of Refractive Error and Familial Aggregation of Myopia in an Elderly American Population
Wojciechowski et al.
IOVS 2005;46:1588-1592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Support for Polygenic Influences on Ocular Refractive Error
Klein et al.
IOVS 2005;46:442-446.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Safety and Efficacy of 2% Pirenzepine Ophthalmic Gel in Children With Myopia: A 1-Year, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Study
Siatkowski et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1667-1674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Locus for Autosomal Dominant High Myopia Maps to the Long Arm of Chromosome 17
Paluru et al.
IOVS 2003;44:1830-1836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myopia and Incident Cataract and Cataract Surgery: The Blue Mountains Eye Study
Younan et al.
IOVS 2002;43:3625-3632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parental Myopia, Near Work, School Achievement, and Children's Refractive Error
Mutti et al.
IOVS 2002;43:3633-3640.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myopia in secondary school students in Mwanza City, Tanzania: the need for a national screening programme
Wedner et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1200-1206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Refraction over 10 Years in an Adult Population: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Lee et al.
IOVS 2002;43:2566-2571.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changing patterns of strabismus: a decade of experience in Hong Kong
Yu et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:854-856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Refractive Error in Children in a Rural Population in India
Dandona et al.
IOVS 2002;43:615-622.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Refractive Error in Children in an Urban Population in New Delhi
Murthy et al.
IOVS 2002;43:623-631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Refractive and Ocular Component Measures of Children Enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET)
Gwiazda et al.
IOVS 2002;43:314-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins
Lyhne et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1470-1476.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aggregation of Refractive Error and 5-Year Changes in Refractive Error Among Families in the Beaver Dam Eye Study
Lee et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1679-1685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach
Seet et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:521-526.
FULL TEXT  

Use of paper selectively absorbing long wavelengths to reduce the impact of educational near work on human refractive development
Kröger and Binder
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;84:890-893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Age-Related Decreases in the Prevalence of Myopia: Longitudinal Change or Cohort Effect?
Mutti and Zadnik
IOVS 2000;41:2103-2107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The heritability of high myopia: a reanalysis of Goldschmidt's data
GUGGENHEIM et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2000;37:227-231.
FULL TEXT  

Changes in Refractive Error over a 5-Year Interval in the Beaver Dam Eye Study
Lee et al.
IOVS 1999;40:1645-1649.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Victoria, Australia
Wensor et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:658-663.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association of Physician Attitudes about Uncertainty and Risk Taking with Resource Use in a Medicare HMO
Allison et al.
Med Decis Making 1998;18:320-329.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.