You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 2, February 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect and a Novel Method of Fusion Recovery With the Worth 4-Dot Test

Lenworth N. Johnson, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(2):171-175.


Abstract

Objective
To examine the relation of the relative afferent pupillary defect and commonly used clinical tests of visual cortex binocular cell activity, namely, fusion and stereopsis.

Methods
Sixty-seven subjects with neuroophthalmologic disorders underwent measurement of relative afferent pupillary defect and assessment of binocular sensory status by fusion on the Worth 4-dot test and stereopsis on the Titmus stereo test. Recovery of fusion on the Worth 4-dot test and improvement of stereopsis were tested by placing increasing neutral density filters in front of the eye that did not have the afferent pupillary defect.

Results
Recovery of fusion on the Worth 4-dot test occurred with use of neutral density filters (Worth 4-dot neutralization test). No improvement of stereopsis was observed. A significant positive association was identified between the measured afferent pupillary defect and the measured log filter required for fusion (r=.83, P<.001 by Spearman rank correlation coefficient). In no case was a relative afferent pupillary defect observed when fusion without use of neutral density filters was present at baseline. For subjects with relative afferent pupillary defects, the measurements of the Worth 4-dot neutralization test were equal before and after pupillary dilation.

Conclusions
The relative afferent pupillary defect is a dynamic process that results from an imbalance of brightness sensitivity between the two eyes. Altering the latency ("timing") and amplitude of the light stimuli by use of neutral density filters can restore fusion on the Worth 4-dot neutralization test but does not alter stereopsis. The Worth 4-dot neutralization test may be a useful adjunct in the assessment of visual dysfunction.



Author Affiliations

From the Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Mason Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri—Columbia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Measuring colour rivalry suppression in amblyopia
Hofeldt and Hofeldt
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1283-1286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.