You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 2, February 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Sources of variability of topometric data with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope

S. Orgul, G. A. Cioffi, D. R. Bacon and E. M. Van Buskirk
Devers Eye Institute, R. S. Dow Neurological Science Institute, Legacy Portland Hospitals, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine in a two-part study whether misalignment between the patient and the laser scanner is a major source of variability with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (Heidelberg [Germany] Engineering). METHODS: Three topographic images of the right optic nerve were acquired with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in eight patients with glaucoma. The correlations between average cup volume, variability of cup volume estimates, and direction of imaging were evaluated. Furthermore, the correlations between average rim volume, variability of rim volume estimates, and direction of imaging were evaluated. Next, the optic nerve cup volume and rim volume estimates of a rabbit's left eye were compared between three series of five topographic images acquired from three slightly different directions. RESULTS: Average cup volume, variability of cup volume estimates, and variability in the direction of imaging correlated significantly among the patients with glaucoma (multiple R2 = .95; P < .001). Average rim volume, variability of rim volume estimates, variability in the direction of imaging, and variability in the mean height of the contour line also correlated significantly (multiple R2 = .88; P = .03). In the rabbit eye, the cup volume and the rim volume differed significantly among the three image series (analysis of variance, P < .001 and P = .04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Misalignment between the patient and the laser scanner may account for significant variability with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements
Strouthidis et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1427-1432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Automated Analysis of Normal and Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Head Topography Images
Swindale et al.
IOVS 2000;41:1730-1742.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reproducibility of volumetric measurements of normal maculae with the Heidelberg retina tomograph
Zambarakji et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1998;82:884-891.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs
Jonas et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1998;82:362-366.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.