You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 12, December 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective study

W. Verdon, M. Bullimore and R. K. Maloney
Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine the effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on best-corrected visual performance using psychophysical tests that were likely to be more sensitive to image degradation than high-contrast Snellen visual acuity. DESIGN: Prospective cases series. PATIENTS: A cohort of 18 subjects with an average of -5.08 diopters (D) of myopia (SD = +/- 1.63 D) was tested before PRK and at 3, 6, and 12 months after PRK. INTERVENTION: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed using a laser (Excimed UV200, Summit Technology, Waltham, Mass) and a polymethylmethacrylate mask; a 5-mm ablation zone was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected high-contrast visual acuity, best-corrected low-contrast visual acuity (18% Weber contrast), and best-corrected letter-contrast sensitivity. Measurements were repeated with dilated pupils and in the presence of a glare source. RESULTS: One year after PRK, the mean best-corrected high-contrast visual acuity was reduced by half a line (P = .01), and the mean best-corrected low-contrast visual acuity was reduced by 1 1/2 lines (P = .002). The losses were somewhat greater when the subject's pupils were dilated and a glare source was used. The reduction in dilated low-contrast visual acuity was positively correlated with the decentration of the ablation zone (r = 0.47), providing evidence of an association between corneal topography and the functional outcome of PRK. CONCLUSION: Low-contrast visual acuity losses after PRK are notably greater than high-contrast visual acuity losses for best-corrected vision. Low-contrast visual acuity is a sensitive measure for gauging the outcome success and safety of refractive surgery.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effect of Optical Zone Decentration on Lower- and Higher-Order Aberrations after Photorefractive Keratectomy in a Cat Model
Buhren et al.
IOVS 2007;48:5806-5814.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contrast Sensitivity Function and Ocular Higher-Order Aberrations following Overnight Orthokeratology
Hiraoka et al.
IOVS 2007;48:550-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Apparent Accommodation and Corneal Wavefront Aberration in Pseudophakic Eyes
Oshika et al.
IOVS 2002;43:2882-2886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond Snellen Acuity: The Assessment of Visual Function After Refractive Surgery
McLeod
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1371-1373.
FULL TEXT  

Ocular Aberrations before and after Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery: LASIK-Induced Changes Measured with Laser Ray Tracing
Moreno-Barriuso et al.
IOVS 2001;42:1396-1403.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ocular Optical Aberrations After Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
Seiler et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:17-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Pupillary Dilation on Corneal Optical Aberrations After Photorefractive Keratectomy
Martinez et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1053-1062.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Laser Refractive Surgery Be Delayed?; There Is No Benefit to Deferring Laser Refractive Surgery
Maloney and Faktorovich
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:669-672.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.