You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 7, July 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diabetic Papillopathy

Patient Characteristics and Fundus Findings

Carl D. Regillo, MD; Gary C. Brown, MD; Peter J. Savino, MD; Gordon A. Byrnes, MD; William E. Benson, MD; William S. Tasman, MD; Robert C. Sergott, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(7):889-895.


Abstract

Objective
To better define the spectrum of patient characteristics and fundus findings in patients with a presumably unique clinical entity referred to as diabetic papillopathy.

Design
Retrospective series.

Setting
A university-based referral practice.

Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all diabetic patients with benign, transient disc swelling who were evaluated at our institution from 1986 to 1992. Data pertaining to patient demographics, visual acuity and symptoms, disc and retinal findings, ancillary test results, and clinical course were collected.

Results
Twenty-seven eyes of 19 patients met the study definition of diabetic papillopathy. Patients were generally older (mean age, 50 years) and of a broader age range (19 to 79 years) compared with those in prior reports. Two thirds of patients had type II diabetes. Disc swelling was consistently hyperemic and, on average, resolved within 3.7 months. Macular edema was a frequent associated finding (70% of eyes) as was significant capillary nonperfusion (52% of tested eyes). Only four eyes (15%) had final visual acuities of less than 20/50 and each had prominent macular edema. Cup-disc ratio analysis of uninvolved eyes revealed a significantly small physiologic cup.

Conclusions
The clinical profile of diabetic papillopathy can be expanded to include people who are older or have type II diabetes and that affected eyes commonly have macular edema or retinal vascular changes that can adversely affect the visual outcome. Last, a small physiologic cup may represent an anatomic predisposition to the condition.



Author Affiliations

From the Retina (Drs Regillo, Brown, Byrnes, Benson, and Tasman) and Neuro-ophthalmology (Drs Savino and Sergott) Services, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa. Dr Regillo is now with the Ophthalmology Department, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, Calif, and Dr Byrnes is now with the Department of Ophthalmology, National Naval Hospital, Bethesda, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Serous Macular Detachment Due to Diabetic Papillopathy Detected Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Nakamura et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:105-107.
FULL TEXT  

Relation between retrobulbar circulation and progression of diabetic retinopathy
Dimitrova et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:622-625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetic tractional papillopathy: a new (and true) nosological entity?
McLEOD
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:257-258.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.