You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 6, June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Clinical Sciences
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The National Basketball Association Eye Injury Study

Bruce M. Zagelbaum, MD; Chad Starkey, PhD; Peter S. Hersh, MD; Eric D. Donnenfeld, MD; Henry D. Perry, MD; Jack B. Jeffers, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(6):749-752.


Abstract



Objective
To investigate the epidemiology of eye injuries sustained by professional basketball players in the National Basketball Association (NBA).

Methods
A prospective study involving all NBA athletes who sustained eye injuries between February 1,1992, and June 20, 1993, was conducted. Twenty-seven NBA team athletic trainers, physicians, and ophthalmologists were provided data forms to complete for any player examined for an eye injury. Practice and game exposures during the preseason, regular season, playoffs, and championships were included.

Results
Of the 1092 injuries sustained by NBA players during the 17-month period, 59 (5.4%) involved the eye and adnexa. Eighteen (30.5%) of the injuries occurred while the player was in the act of rebounding, and 16 (27.1%) while the player was on offense. The most common diagnoses included 30 abrasions or lacerations to the eyelid (50.9%), 17 contusions (edema and/or ecchymosis) to the eyelid or periorbital region (28.8%), and seven corneal abrasions (11.9%). There were three orbital fractures (5.1%). Most injuries were caused by fingers (35.6%) or elbows (28.8%). Nine players (15.3%) missed subsequent games because of their injury. Fiftyseven players (96.6%) were not wearing protective eyewear at the time of injury.

Conclusions
The incidence of eye injuries in NBA players during the 17-month period was 1.44 per 1000 game exposures. Frequent physical contact in professional basketball players leaves them at great risk for sustaining eye injuries. To prevent these injuries, protective eyewear is recommended.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Ophthalmology, North Shore University Hospital, Cornell University Medical College, Manhasset, NY (Drs Zagelbaum, Donnenfeld, and Perry); Department of Ophthalmology, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Drs Zagelbaum and Hersh); Department of Physical Therapy, Northeastern University Athletic Training Education Program, Boston, Mass (Dr Starkey); and Department of Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Jeffers). Dr Zagelbaum is now in private practice in Manhasset, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Epidemiology of Pediatric Basketball Injuries Presenting to US Emergency Departments: 2000-2006
Pappas et al.
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach 2011;3:331-335.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Injury Risk in Professional Basketball Players: A Comparison of Women's National Basketball Association and National Basketball Association Athletes
Deitch et al.
Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1077-1083.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ocular Injuries: Is It Possible to Further Limit the Occurrence Rate?
Mieler
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1712-1713.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.