You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 6, June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The effectiveness initiative. I. Medical practice guidelines

J. D. Trobe and A. M. Fendrick
Department of Ophthalmology, W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

We examined the impact of the "effectiveness initiative" and medical practice guidelines on the practice of ophthalmology. The effectiveness initiative asserts that much of current medical practice is unnecessary or harmful, too costly, and unresponsive to patient desires. It promotes more critical review of the medical literature, research on outcomes, and stringent practice guidelines. Whereas current practice guidelines are helpful in codifying accepted procedures, they tend to sanction interventions of unproved value. Future guidelines will probably reject unproved interventions, especially if they are expensive. Although such guidelines may limit physicians' freedom of choice, they may protect them against capricious malpractice claims and unreasonable patient expectations.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.