You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Efficacy of Apraclonidine as an Adjunct to Timolol Therapy

William C. Stewart, MD; Robert Ritch, MD; Dong H. Shin, MD, PhD; Robert P. Lehmann, MD; C. Eric Shrader, MD; E. Michael van Buskirk, MD; Apraclonidine Adjunctive Therapy Study Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(3):287-292.


Abstract

Objective
To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy of 0.5% and 1.0% apraclonidine hydrochloride when used adjunctively with 0.5% timolol maleate in 129 patients.

Design
A multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trial. Adult patients of either sex diagnosed as having either open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were enrolled in the study. Patients using only 0.5% timolol maleate twice daily for at least 4 weeks and who had 8 AM IOPs of at least 22 mm Hg and no greater than 30 mm Hg 12 hours after dosing were eligible for the study. After 8 AM baseline IOPs were obtained while patients were taking timolol only, they were then randomized to receive either 0.5% or 1.0% apraclonidine twice daily in addition to their timolol. Intraocular pressures were measured at 8 AM (before morning dosing) and at 11 AM (3 hours after dosing) on days 14 and 90 and at 8 AM only on day 45.

Results
Both concentrations of apraclonidine produced significant IOP reductions from baseline at all visits (P<.001). At 8 AM, after the nighttime dose, the additional mean IOP reduction from the timolol baseline ranged from 2.5 to 3.3 mm Hg (10.3% to 13.6% reduction, respectively). At 11 AM, 3 hours after the morning dose, the additional IOP reduction from the timolol baseline ranged from 4.7 to 5.2 mm Hg (20.0% to 21.7%, respectively). No difference in IOP reduction was observed between the 0.5% and 1.0% apraclonidine concentrations and no loss of IOP efficacy was observed for either concentration for the duration of the study. Sensitivity to 0.5% and 1.0% apraclonidine was observed in nine (13.8%) and 13 (20.3%) patients, respectively. Overall, therapy was discontinued owing to ocular or nonocular side effects with 0.5% and 1.0% apraclonidine in 14 (21.5%) and 16 (25%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions
We believe that 0.5% apraclonidine is equally effective as 1.0% apraclonidine when used twice daily as the first adjunctive drug to timolol. The drug effect is maintained for at least 90 days.



Author Affiliations

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Stewart); New York (NY) Eye and Ear Infirmary (Dr Ritch); Wayne State University, Detroit, Mich (Dr Shin); Lehmann Eye Center, Nacogdoches, Tex (Dr Lehmann); Eye Clinic of Wichita (Kan) (Dr Shrader); and Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Ore (Dr van Buskirk). Participants of the Apraclonidine Adjunctive Therapy Study Group are listed on page 292. The authors have no proprietary interest in either Alcon Laboratories Inc and apraclonidine or Merck & Co Inc and timolol.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Aqueous Humor Flow in Normal Human Eyes Treated With Brimonidine and Timolol, Alone and in Combination
Larsson
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:492-495.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Early Effects of Brimonidine and Apraclonidine as Topical Ocular Hypotensive Agents
Maus et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:586-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

{beta}-Blocker-Induced Complications and the Patient With Glaucoma: Newer Treatments to Help Reduce Systemic Adverse Events
Stewart and Garrison
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:221-226.
FULL TEXT  

A 1-Year Study of Brimonidine Twice Daily in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial
Schuman et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:847-852.
ABSTRACT  

The management of primary open angle glaucoma
DTB 1997;35:4-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 90-Day Study of the Efficacy and Side Effects of 0.25% and 0.5% Apraclonidine vs 0.5% Timolol
Stewart et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:938-942.
ABSTRACT  

Questions Concerning the Role of Apraclonidine in the Management of Glaucoma
Robin
Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:712-714.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.