You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 2, February 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

One-Year Results of the Intrastromal Corneal Ring in Nonfunctional Human Eyes

Kerry K. Assil, MD; Andrew M. Barrett, MD; Bradley D. Fouraker, MD; David J. Schanzlin, MD; Intrastromal Corneal Ring Study Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(2):159-167.


Abstract

Objective
The intrastromal corneal ring (ICR), a new keratorefractive device designed to correct myopia, was evaluated for safety and efficacy as part of a phase I Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.

Patients and Methods
Ten patients, each with one nonfunctional eye, underwent surgical implantation of the ICR, which is a split ring composed of polymethyl methacrylate. The eyes were followed up during a 1-year period and were evaluated for wound healing, implant-related inflammation, intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and refractive effects.

Results
Wound healing was uncomplicated in all of the patients. No patient experienced implant-associated inflammation or extrusion. Intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, and endothelial cell counts were unaffected by the ICR. Non—sight-threatening intraoperative events included ring decentration and inadequate attachment of a vacuum-centering guide. The ICR reduced keratometrically determined spherical equivalence by an average of –2.5±1.1 diopters (mean±SD). Spherical equivalence, as determined by retinoscopy, was reduced by an average of–2.4±1.0 D. Results of corneoscopy and computerized videokeratography further confirmed this reduction of myopia.

Conclusions
The ICR may be a safe and efficacious device that offers predictable results with few side effects, and it may be a feasible alternative to current keratorefractive procedures.



Author Affiliations

From the Anheuser-Busch Eye Institute, St Louis (Mo) University. Dr. Schanzlin is a paid consultant for KeraVision Inc, Fremont, Calif. The other authors have no proprietary interest in any research or materials presented in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Corneal Changes Associated With Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments
Fink et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:282-282.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.