You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 11, November 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

An updated standard for clinical electroretinography

M. F. Marmor
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine, USA.

The value of the electroretinogram (ERG) in clinical practice depends in part on its consistency and the ability to compare results with other laboratories and the literature. These issues were addressed by the publication of the International Standard for Clinical Electroretinography in 1989. This Standard provided technical information and defined a core of basic test procedures and test responses (Figure) to ensure that ERGs performed worldwide would be equivalent for clinical and research purposes. Most major laboratories now subscribe to the tenets of the Standard, and it should be noted that the Standard does not limit laboratories from doing additional specialized tests (beyond the recommendations) for either clinical purposes or research. Since science and medicine are not static, the original Standard mandated revision every 4 years by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The first revision, titled "Standard for Clinical Electrophysiology (1994 Update)," has just been published, and it contains changes and new provisions that should be reviewed carefully by those who perform ERGs. The major changes and additions in the updated ERG Standard are as follows.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Daclizumab for Treatment of Birdshot Chorioretinopathy
Sobrin et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:186-191.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Amplitude Reduction of the PhNR after Macular Hole Surgery: Ganglion Cell Damage Related to ICG-Assisted ILM Peeling and Gas Tamponade.
Ueno et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3545-3549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cone Dysfunction in Patients With Late-Onset Cone Dystrophy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Ladewig et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1557-1561.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Description of a New Mutation in Rhodopsin, Pro23Ala, and Comparison With Electroretinographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Pro23His Mutation
Oh et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1269-1276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.