You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (53)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Visual Field Profile of Optic Neuritis

One-Year Follow-up in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

John L. Keltner, MD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD; John O. Spurr, MA, MBA; Roy W. Beck, MD, PhD; Optic Neuritis Study Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(7):946-953.


Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this present study was to evaluate longitudinal visual field information for 448 patients over their first year of follow-up in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.

Methods
We reviewed 6536 automated static visual fields performed on a visual field analyzer (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer) at nine visits within the 1-year period for each of the patients.

Results
The median values of the mean deviations for affected eyes were as follows: -22.88 dB at baseline, -1.94 dB at 6 months, and -1.62 dB at 1 year. At 6 months, 51% of affected eye visual fields were normal, and at 1 year 55.9% were normal. Approximately two thirds (68.8%) of the fellow eyes were classified as abnormal at baseline, although the defects were generally slight. One third (33.2%) were abnormal at 6 months, and approximately one third were still abnormal at 1 year. More than 87% of those abnormal at 6 months and at 1 year had been abnormal at baseline. Binocular analysis revealed that 13.2% of patients showed a chiasmal or retrochiasmal type of field defect at least once during the year (5.1% bitemporal; 8.9% homonymous). Of the patients who showed a retrochiasmal visual field defect, 75.7% had an abnormal magnetic resonance imaging scan at baseline compared with 46% of the rest of the patients in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (X2=10.73, df=1, P<.002).

Conclusion
Over the first year of follow-up, the majority of patients with visual field defects from acute optic neuritis returned to normal, as measured by automated static perimetry. Many fields showed variation in the pattern and location of the sensitivity loss. Chiasmal and retrochiasmal defects occurred more commonly than previously reported.



Author Affiliations

From the University of California-Davis (Drs Keltner and Johnson and Mr Spurr) and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Fla (Dr Beck). Members of the Optic Neuritis Study Group are listed on page 953.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial: A Definitive Answer and Profound Impact With Unexpected Results
Volpe
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:996-999.
FULL TEXT  

Humphrey Matrix Perimetry in Optic Nerve and Chiasmal Disorders: Comparison with Humphrey SITA Standard 24-2
Huang et al.
IOVS 2008;49:917-923.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Relationship between Visual Field and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Cheng et al.
IOVS 2007;48:5798-5805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual function at baseline and 1 month in acute optic neuritis: Predictors of visual outcome
Kupersmith et al.
Neurology 2007;69:508-514.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

OCT Measurements in Patients with Optic Disc Edema
Menke et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3807-3811.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Classification of Visual Field Abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Keltner et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:643-650.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contrast-enhanced MRI in acute optic neuritis: relationship to visual performance
Kupersmith et al.
Brain 2002;125:812-822.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation of visual evoked potential delay to stimulation of central, nasal, and temporal regions of the macula in optic neuritis
Rinalduzzi et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2001;70:28-35.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields
Hollander et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:1185-1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Resolved Optic Neuritis
Fujimoto and Adachi-Usami
IOVS 2000;41:2558-2560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practice parameter: The role of corticosteroids in the management of acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Kaufman et al.
Neurology 2000;54:2039-2044.
FULL TEXT  

Computerized color perimetry in multiple sclerosis
Accornero et al.
Mult Scler 1998;4:79-84.
ABSTRACT  

Visual Function 5 Years After Optic Neuritis: Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial
The Optic Neuritis Study Group
Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1545-1552.
ABSTRACT  

Fluorescein Angiography in Nonischemic Optic Disc Edema
Arnold et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:293-298.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.