You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 12, December 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Surgical results of trabeculotomy ab externo for developmental glaucoma

M. Akimoto, H. Tanihara, A. Negi and M. Nagata
Department of Ophthalmology, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate long-term surgical outcome of trabeculotomy ab externo in the treatment of developmental glaucoma. PATIENTS: Included in this retrospective study are 116 eyes of 71 patients with developmental glaucoma. We classified patients into three groups based on their age: congenital (33 eyes), existing before age 2 months; infantile (31 eyes), occurring from ages 2 months to 2 years; and juvenile (52 eyes), age 2 years or older. RESULTS: A life-table analysis showed that the total success probabilities at 5 and 10 years with one or more trabeculotomy ab externo operations were, respectively, 92.5% +/- 2.7% and 76.5% +/- 6.2%. The success probability of patients with congenital glaucoma (60.3% +/- 15.9%) was significantly lower than it was for those with infantile (96.3% +/- 3.6%) or juvenile (76.4% +/- 7.5%) glaucoma (P < .01 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical results of trabeculotomy ab externo remain effective for a long time. Congenital glaucoma has the worst prognosis, and infantile glaucoma has a better prognosis than does juvenile glaucoma.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Long-term Outcome of Trabeculotomy for the Treatment of Developmental Glaucoma
Ikeda et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1122-1128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.