Comparison of diabetic retinopathy detection by clinical examinations and photograph gradings. Barbados (West Indies) Eye Study Group

A. P. Schachat, L. Hyman, M. C. Leske, A. M. Connell, C. Hiner, N. Javornik and J. Alexander
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of clinical examination and fundus photograph gradings in detecting diabetic retinopathy in a population that includes persons with and without diabetes. DESIGN: Population-based epidemiologic study. SETTING: Sir Winston Scott Polyclinic, Bridgetown, Barbados, West Indies. PARTICIPANTS: Subset of a random sample of the country's population aged 40 to 86 years. RESULTS: Among 1168 black persons with fundus photograph evaluations, ophthalmologic examinations, diabetes history, and glycated hemoglobin data, 21% reported a history of diabetes; 9.5% had definite diabetes (glycated hemoglobin > 11.5%); and 13.3% had a diabetes history and glycated hemoglobin value less than or equal to 11.5%. The frequency of diabetic retinopathy in this group was 7.7% (90/1168) by clinical examination, 8.7% (102/1168) by photograph gradings, and 6.7% (78/1168) by both methods. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in certain populations that include diabetics and nondiabetics, a clinical examination by an ophthalmologist will detect most cases of diabetic retinopathy identified by disc and macula photographs read by skilled graders. However, it will lead to an underestimate of prevalence. Staff availability and cost, issues not examined in this study, should determine which approach is selected.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Nine-year incidence of diabetic retinopathy in the barbados eye studies.
Leske et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:250-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Adults in the United States
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:552-563.
 

Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy
Scanlon et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1258-1263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Developing a Screening Program to Detect Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy in South India
Namperumalsamy et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:1831-1835.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for diabetic retinopathy in James Bay, Ontario: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Maberley et al.
CMAJ 2003;168:160-164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes in a Caribbean population: epidemiological profile and implications
Hennis et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:234-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Two-Field Photography Can Identify Patients With Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy: A screening approach in the primary care setting
Stellingwerf et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:2086-2090.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Diagnosis of Early Retinal Lesions of Diabetic Retinopathy Between a Computer System and Human Experts
Lee et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:509-515.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Complications of diabetes: screening for retinopathy and management of foot ulcers
Melville et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2000;9:137-141.
FULL TEXT  

Use of eye care services by people with diabetes: the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project
McCarty et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1998;82:410-414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus diagnosed after the age of 70 years
Cahill et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:218-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool diabetic eye study
Harding et al.
BMJ 1995;311:1131-1135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT