You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 7, July 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Clinical Sciences
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Grading of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defects

Raymond A. Bell; Perry M. Waggoner, MD; William M. Boyd, MD; Richard E. Akers, MD; C. Edward Yee, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(7):938-942.


Abstract



Objectives
To assess the validity and reproducibility of quantitating relative afferent pupillary defects with the swinging flashlight test, using a 3-second pause technique, and to compare this grading system with that using neutral density filters.

Design
We prospectively studied patients with relative afferent pupillary defects by using the swinging flashlight test with a standardized illumination time of 3 seconds (pause time) for each eye. Each relative afferent pupillary defect was graded as follows: grade I, a weak initial constriction and greater redilatation; grade II, initial stall and greater redilatation; grade III, immediate pupillary dilatation; grade IV, immediate pupillary dilatation following prolonged illumination of the good eye for 6 seconds; grade V, immediate pupillary dilatation with no secondary constriction. The grades on the individual resident evaluations were compared with those on the group evaluations, and the grading system was compared with the neutral density filter grading system.

Setting
Neuro-ophthalmology service of an urban teaching hospital.

Study Participants
A total of 119 patients.

Results
There was a good correlation in all grades between individual resident and group evaluations, with an overall 78% agreement. The five grades had corresponding values in neutral density filter log units: grade I, 0.4; grade II, 0.7; grade III, 1.1; grade IV, 2.0; and grade V, infinity.

Conclusions
The 3-second pause technique for the swinging flashlight test is a reliable method for the detection and quantitation of relative afferent pupillary defects. The grading system can be compared with the neutral density filter grading system, and each grade has a corresponding value in log units.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Correlation of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Unilateral or Asymmetric Demyelinating Optic Neuropathy
Younis and Eggenberger
IOVS 2010;51:4013-4016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantifying relative afferent pupillary defects using a Sbisa bar
McCormick et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:985-987.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantification of relative afferent pupillary defects induced by posterior sub-Tenon's, peribulbar, and retrobulbar anaesthetics
Ramsay et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1445-1446.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantification of Optic Nerve Axon Loss Associated With a Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect in the Monkey
Kerrison et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1333-1341.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.