You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of laser phacovaporization using the Er-YAG and the Er-YSGG laser

R. P. Gailitis, S. W. Patterson, M. A. Samuels, K. Hagen, Q. Ren and G. O. Waring 3rd
Eye Care and Surgery Center of Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304.

OBJECTIVE--To study the interaction of the erbium (Er)-YAG (2.94 microns) and the Er-YSGG (2.79 microns) lasers with the human crystalline lens tissue. METHODS--Fresh human crystalline lens sections were used to measure the photovaporization threshold, rate, and damage zone of the two lasers. RESULTS--We found the photovaporization threshold for the Er-YAG and the Er-YSGG lasers to be 1.4 J/cm2 and 5.5 J/cm2, respectively. At 10 J/cm2, the photovaporization rate is 67.9 microns per pulse for the Er-YAG laser and 18.4 microns per pulse for the Er-YSGG laser. The increased rate of photovaporization as a function of radiant energy for the Er-YAG laser is almost twice that for the Er-YSGG. Damage zones for the Er-YAG laser ranged from 4 to 9 microns compared with 10 to 22 microns for the Er-YSGG. CONCLUSIONS--It is apparent that both lasers can adequately photovaporize human crystalline lens tissue and should be further studied for this purpose.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.