 |
|
Accuracy of Coding in Medicare Part B ClaimsCataract as a Case Study
Jonathan C. Javitt, MD, MPH;
A. Marshall McBean, MD, MSc;
Srinivas S. Sastry, MD, MPH;
Francis DiPaolo, Jr, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(5):605-607.
Abstract
| |
• We studied the accuracy of Medicare part B coding for cataract extraction to provide validation for research involving Medicare data. Hospital and physician office records associated with a sample of 802 paid claims for cataract surgery were reviewed. The sample was randomly selected from 118 420 Medicare part B claims for cataract surgery submitted by physicians in an 11-state sample during the first quarter of 1988. Medical records were successfully obtained for 796 cataract surgery episodes (99.2%), of which 794 (99.7%) indicated that cataract extraction had been performed. In the remaining two cases, cataract surgery was attempted but aborted. In 24 (3%) of the 794 cases, the surgical approach (intracapsular or extracapsular) indicated in the operative note differed from that coded on the physician's bill. In all cases in which the operative note indicated a secondary procedure performed at the time of surgery, the billing information was in agreement. We conclude that, at least in the case of cataract surgery, the Medicare part B database is 99% accurate (95% confidence interval, ±0.6%) for cataract surgery having occurred and 96% accurate (95% confidence interval, ±1.4%) in terms of surgical approach.
Author Affiliations
From the Worthen Center for Eye Care Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (Drs Javitt, Sastry, and DiPaolo) and the Office of Research, Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, Md (Dr McBean).
Footnotes
Accepted for publication December 4, 1992.
Reprint requests to Center for Sight, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (Dr Javitt).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Trends in Annual Medicare Expenditures for Glaucoma Surgical Procedures From 1997 to 2006
Schmier et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:900-905.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adverse Events After Outpatient Colonoscopy in the Medicare Population
Warren et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:849-857.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Identification of Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema From Claims Data: A Validation Study
Bearelly et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:986-989.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of Trends in the Cost of Initial Cancer Treatment
Warren et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:888-897.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Data Sources for Measuring Colorectal Endoscopy Use Among Medicare Enrollees
Schenck et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:2118-2127.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Re: Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Following Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors During Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Warren and Brown
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1050-1050.
FULL TEXT
Surveillance Patterns and Polyp Recurrence following Diagnosis and Excision of Colorectal Polyps in a Medicare Population
Amonkar et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:417-421.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Medicare Coverage on Use of Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
Ko et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2581-2586.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Diagnoses of Patients Treated With ECT: A Comparison of Evidence-Based Standards With Reported Use
Hermann et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1999;50:1059-1065.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Variations in Cataract Extraction Rates in Medicare Prepaid and Fee-for-Service Settings
Goldzweig et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1765-1768.
ABSTRACT
Preparing for Managed Competition: Utilization of Ophthalmologic Services Varies by State
Javitt and Chiang
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1469-1470.
Who Does Cataract Surgery in the United States?
Javitt
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1329-1329.
|
