You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Accuracy of coding in Medicare part B claims. Cataract as a case study

J. C. Javitt, A. M. McBean, S. S. Sastry and F. DiPaolo
Worthen Center for Eye Care Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.

We studied the accuracy of Medicare part B coding for cataract extraction to provide validation for research involving Medicare data. Hospital and physician office records associated with a sample of 802 paid claims for cataract surgery were reviewed. The sample was randomly selected from 118,420 Medicare part B claims for cataract surgery submitted by physicians in an 11-state sample during the first quarter of 1988. Medical records were successfully obtained for 796 cataract surgery episodes (99.2%), of which 794 (99.7%) indicated that cataract extraction had been performed. In the remaining two cases, cataract surgery was attempted but aborted. In 24 (3%) of the 794 cases, the surgical approach (intracapsular or extracapsular) indicated in the operative note differed from the coded on the physician's bill. In all cases in which the operative note indicated a secondary procedure performed at the time of surgery, the billing information was in agreement. We conclude that, at least in the case of cataract surgery, the Medicare part B database is 99% accurate (95% confidence interval, +/- 0.6%) for cataract surgery having occurred and 96% accurate (95% confidence interval, +/- 1.4%) in terms of surgical approach.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Identification of Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema From Claims Data: A Validation Study
Bearelly et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:986-989.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Trends in the Cost of Initial Cancer Treatment
Warren et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:888-897.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Data Sources for Measuring Colorectal Endoscopy Use Among Medicare Enrollees
Schenck et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:2118-2127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Re: Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Following Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors During Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Warren and Brown
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1050-1050.
FULL TEXT  

Surveillance Patterns and Polyp Recurrence following Diagnosis and Excision of Colorectal Polyps in a Medicare Population
Amonkar et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:417-421.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Medicare Coverage on Use of Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
Ko et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2581-2586.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnoses of Patients Treated With ECT: A Comparison of Evidence-Based Standards With Reported Use
Hermann et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1999;50:1059-1065.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.