You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 11, November 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Pseudo low penetrance in retinoblastoma. Fortuitous familial aggregation of sporadic cases caused by independently derived mutations in two large pedigrees

F. L. Munier, M. X. Wang, M. A. Spence, F. Thonney, A. Balmer, G. Pescia, L. A. Donoso and A. L. Murphree
Division of Ophthalmology, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, Calif.

OBJECTIVE: The disparate occurrence of few cases of retinoblastoma in the same extended pedigree confronts us with the unsolved problem of a low-penetrant autosomal-dominant trait vs fortuitous familial aggregation of sporadic cases. Determination as to whether the disease arises from a common inherited mutation or sporadic mutations has important implications for genetic counseling. This is illustrated in this report of two presumed low-penetrant retinoblastoma pedigrees characterized by two distantly affected relatives connected through apparently healthy carriers. DESIGN: We mathematically modeled the inheritance patterns and calculated the a priori relative probabilities of heredity with low penetrance vs chance occurrence of independent mutations for each pedigree. The derived odds clearly show that the disease, which occurred twice in each family, most likely resulted from unrelated mutations. To prove this, extensive DNA testing was conducted, including determination of intragenic RB1 DNA sequence polymorphisms and screening for mutation using the polymerase chain reaction coupled with single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. PATIENTS: All living key members from both pedigrees were included. RESULTS: Consistent with our initial expectation, there was no common intragenic haplotype or common germ-line mutation that segregated with the disease phenotype in either of these two families. CONCLUSIONS: We therefore conclude that collateral incidence of retinoblastoma in these two pedigrees occurred by chance and not according to autosomal-dominant inheritance with low penetrance. Furthermore, our data provide the first evidence, to our knowledge, that related individuals may have independent mutations involving an identical gene locus, giving rise to an artefactual inheritance pattern.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Familial Retinoblastoma With Unilateral and Unifocal Involvement in 2 Families
Sarafzadeh et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1308-1309.
FULL TEXT  

Paternal Uniparental Heterodisomy With Partial Isodisomy of Chromosome 1 in a Patient With Retinitis Pigmentosa Without Hearing Loss and a Missense Mutation in the Usher Syndrome Type II Gene USH2A
Rivolta et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1566-1571.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A constitutional homozygous mutation in the RB1 gene in a patient with unilateral retinoblastoma
SÁNCHEZ et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2000;37:615-620.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.