You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 8, August 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Diverse Appearances of Uveal Malignant Melanomas

Philip A. Bloom, FCOphth; John D. Ferris, MB; David A. H. Laidlaw, FCOphth; Paul R. Goddard, FRCR

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(8):1105-1111.


Abstract

• Fifteen patients with uveal malignant melanomas were studied by magnetic resonance imaging. The magnetic resonance imaging appearances varied from those that have been reported previously to be characteristic of these tumors. In our series, malignant melanomas were of high signal on the T1 sequence and of variable but usually also of high signal on the T2 and Short Tau/nversion Recovery (STIR) sequences, a signal combination rarely described before. We postulate that magnetic resonance imaging appearances may be dependent on variations in histologic factors and on the type and field strength of the scanner used. It is widely believed that the paramagnetic melanin in malignant melanomas gives these tumors characteristic magnetic resonance imaging appearances, but our finding of diverse magnetic resonance imaging appearances for proved malignant melanomas suggests that this may not always be the case. We advise caution in diagnosing malignant melanomas from magnetic resonance imaging appearances alone.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol (England) Eye Hospital (Drs Bloom, Ferris, and Laidlaw), and the Bristol Magnetic Resonance Imaging Centre, Frenchay Hospital (Dr Goddard). Dr Bloom is now with Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, England.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 13, 1992.

Reprint requests to Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Rd, London, England EC1 2PD (Dr Bloom).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Uveal Melanoma: Correlation of Histopathologic and Radiologic Findings by Using Thin-Section MR Imaging with a Surface Coil
Lemke et al.
Radiology 1999;210:775-783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the Melanin Content of Uveal Malignant Melanomas Correlate With Their Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appearance?-Reply
De Potter et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:556-556.
ABSTRACT  

Does the Melanin Content of Uveal Malignant Melanomas Correlate With Their Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appearance?
Ferris and Bloom
Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:555-556.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.