You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 7, July 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  CLINICOPATHOLOGIC REPORT
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Unsuccessful Excimer Laser Phototherapeutic Keratectomy

Clinicopathologic Correlation

Jan M. McDonnell, MD; Jenny J. Garbus; Peter J. McDonnell, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(7):977-979.


Abstract



• A 46-year-old man underwent phototherapeutic keratectomy with a 193-nm excimer laser in an attempt to remove a superficial corneal scar that had been present for 36 years. The scar proved to be resistant to ablation with the laser, while relatively normal stroma was easily ablated. Histopathologic examination of the corneal button removed 3 months after excimer laser surgery revealed absence of Bowman's membrane in the area of ablation, superficial stromal disorganization and scarring, raised nodules of collagenous tissue extending into the epithelium, and no calcification within the lesion. Ultrastructural examination was remarkable for irregularly oriented collagen fibers within the scar. The resistance of this lesion to excimer laser ablation appears to have been the consequence of marked differences in rates of ablation between normal stroma and the very longstanding scar.



Author Affiliations



From the Doheny Eye Institute and the Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs J. McDonnell and P. McDonnell and Ms Garbus) and Pathology (Dr J. McDonnell), University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles. The authors and their family members have no financial or proprietary interest in any of the materials or methods described in this study.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication February 25, 1992.

Reprint requests to the Doheny Eye Institute, 1450 San Pablo St, Los Angeles, CA 90033 (Dr P. McDonnell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.