You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 6, June 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation of Methods for Automated Hemifield Analysis in Perimetry

Peter Åsman, MD; Anders Heijl, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):820-826.


Abstract

• A new aid to perimetric analysis, the Glaucoma Hemifield Test, primarily evaluates up-down differences in automated static visual field tests. We analyzed the visual fields of 163 eyes of 163 normal subjects and 77 eyes of 77 patients with glaucoma diagnosed on bases other than perimetry using the Glaucoma Hemifield Test and a similar, previously developed, hemifield analysis method. The performance of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test was compared with that of the earlier method and the differences in test design were evaluated individually. The Glaucoma Hemifield Test allowed significantly improved separation between the normal group and the group with glaucoma than did the earlier method. This improvement was due to an increase in sensitivity, and was associated with the use of test point significances instead of threshold values, and a large normal database alone in the determination of normal limits.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 1, 1992.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, Malmö General Hospital, S-21401, Malmö, Sweden (Dr Åsman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessing Visual Field Clustering Schemes Using Machine Learning Classifiers in Standard Perimetry
Boden et al.
IOVS 2007;48:5582-5590.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Luminance-Modulated Adaptation of Global Flash mfERG: Fellow Eye Losses in Asymmetric Glaucoma
Chu et al.
IOVS 2007;48:2626-2633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors for Glaucoma Progression and the Effect of Treatment: The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Leske et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:48-56.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduction of Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma Progression: Results From the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Heijl et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-1279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with visual field and scanning laser polarimetry measurements
Lauande-Pimentel et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:586-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ganglion Cell Losses Underlying Visual Field Defects from Experimental Glaucoma
Harwerth et al.
IOVS 1999;40:2242-2250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Motion Perimetry Identifies Nerve Fiber Bundlelike Defects in Ocular Hypertension
Wall et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:26-33.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of Cataract Extraction on Automated Fields in Chronic Open-angle Glaucoma
Stewart et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:875-879.
ABSTRACT  

Glaucoma Hemifield Test: Automated Visual Field Evaluation
Asman and Heijl
Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:812-819.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.