You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 10, October 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A randomized, prospective, double-masked clinical trial of Optisol vs DexSol corneal storage media

J. H. Lass, W. M. Bourne, D. C. Musch, A. Sugar, J. F. Gordon, W. J. Reinhart, R. F. Meyer, D. I. Patel, W. E. Bruner, D. B. Cano and al. et
Department of Ophthalmology, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio 44106.

We compared Optisol and DexSol, two chondroitin-sulfate-based media for corneal storage at 4 degrees C, by transplanting 31 donor cornea pairs (one cornea stored in Optisol and its mate in DexSol for 20 to 134 hours) into 31 pairs of recipients (62 patients). All grafts were clear 1 year after transplantation except for one primary donor failure (Optisol group). Optisol-stored corneas were significantly thinner than DexSol-stored corneas after cardinal suture placement (0.64 mm vs 0.76 mm) and at the end of surgery (0.69 mm vs 0.78 mm); at all points afterward through 1 year the two groups did not differ. The activity of two lysosomal enzymes released into the media during storage, alpha-mannosidase and alpha-glucosidase, was lower in the Optisol group. Epithelial status and all endothelial morphometric parameters, except the figure coefficient at 1 year, did not differ between the two groups before surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Mean endothelial cell loss at 1 year was 15% for the Optisol group and 21% for the DexSol group (P = .22). Thus, Optisol-stored corneas were thinner during surgery than DexSol-stored corneas and there was less lysosomal enzyme activity in the Optisol medium after tissue storage. There were no significant differences in postoperative clinical or endothelial morphometric parameters, however.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trial of Optisol-GS vs Chen Medium for Human Corneal Storage
Naor et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1280-1285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Keratocyte Activation and Apoptosis in Transplanted Human Corneas in a Xenograft Model
Ohno et al.
IOVS 2002;43:1025-1031.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective, Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Optisol vs Organ Culture Corneal Storage Media
Frueh and Bohnke
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:757-760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Double-Masked, Randomized, 1-Year Study Comparing the Corneal Effects of Dorzolamide, Timolol, and Betaxolol
Lass et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1003-1010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Storage of Human Corneas in Dextran and Chondroitin Sulfate-Based Corneal Storage Medium: Changes in Stromal Free Sodium
Jablonski-Stiemke and Edelhauser
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:627-632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.