You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 7, July 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Aminoglycoside toxicity--a survey of retinal specialists. Implications for ocular use

P. A. Campochiaro and B. P. Conway
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

Surveyed members of the Retina, Macula, and Vitreous Societies reported 93 cases of macular infarction they believed to be related to administration of gentamicin sulfate; five, to administration of amikacin sulfate; and three, to administration of tobramycin sulfate. Most cases of infarction after administration of gentamicin occurred in eyes that received an intravitreous injection of 0.4 mg after vitrectomy, but a surprisingly high number, 17, occurred after injection of 0.1 or 0.2 mg, doses that are considered safe by many ophthalmologists. Four additional cases of infarction occurred in eyes that did not undergo vitrectomy after injection of 0.1 or 0.2 mg. Four of the five cases related to administration of amikacin occurred after intravitreous injection of 0.4 mg, and one of these four occurred in an eye that did not undergo vitrectomy. Twenty-three cases of macular infarction occurred in eyes that were treated with prophylactic subconjunctival injections of aminoglycosides after routine ocular surgery. Responses from this survey suggest that aminoglycoside-induced retinal infarction is widely recognized and more common than indicated from the small number of cases reported in the literature. The role of aminoglycosides in the prophylaxis of ocular infections and the management of endophthalmitis should be reevaluated.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Macular Infarction Following Viperine Snake Bite
Singh et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1430-1431.
FULL TEXT  

Intravitreal moxifloxacin: retinal safety study with electroretinography and histopathology in animal models.
Gao et al.
IOVS 2006;47:1606-1611.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Macular infarction after intravitreal amikacin: mounting evidence against amikacin
Galloway et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:359-360.
FULL TEXT  

In vitro analysis of aminoglycoside therapy for the Arg120stop nonsense mutation in RP2 patients
Grayson et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2002;39:62-67.
FULL TEXT  

Vancomycin and ceftazidime incompatibility upon intravitreal injection
LIFSHITZ et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;84:117a-117.
FULL TEXT  

Amikacin retinal toxicity
JACKSON and WILLIAMSON
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1999;83:1194f-1194.
FULL TEXT  

Current approach to postoperative endophthalmitis
SUNARIC-MEGEVAND and POURNARAS
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:1006-1015.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.