You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 4, April 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Social determinants of cataract surgery utilization in south India. The Operations Research Group

G. E. Brilliant, J. M. Lepkowski, B. Zurita and R. D. Thulasiraj
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

A field trial was conducted to compare the effects of eight health education and economic incentive interventions on the awareness and acceptance of cataract surgery. Cataract screening and follow-up surgery were offered to more than 19,000 residents age 40 years and older in a probability sample of 90 villages in south India. Eight months after intervention, an evaluation was conducted to identify those in need of surgery who had been operated on. Two principal measures of program effectiveness are examined: awareness of cataract surgery and acceptance of the surgery. The type of intervention had a negligible effect on awareness of cataract surgery. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that individuals who were aware of surgery tended to be male, literate, and more affluent than those who were unaware of that option. Interventions that covered the complete costs of surgery had higher surgery acceptance rates. One health education strategy, house-to-house visits by a subject with aphakia, increased acceptance of the procedure more than others. In a multiple logistic regression analysis of acceptance rates, persons accepting surgery tended to be male; other factors were not important in explaining variation in acceptance rates.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Willingness to pay for cataract surgery in Kathmandu valley
Shrestha et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:319-320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex inequalities in cataract blindness burden and surgical services in south India
Nirmalan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:847-849.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blindness and visual impairment in the Americas and the Caribbean
Munoz and West
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:498-504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic status and blindness
Dandona and Dandona
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1484-1488.
FULL TEXT  

Low Uptake of Eye Services in Rural India: A Challenge for Programs of Blindness Prevention
Fletcher et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1393-1399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic barriers to cataract surgery in Nepal: the south Asian cataract management study
Snellingen et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1424-1428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.